Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20151215/ Title: CSS Writing Modes Level 3 Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted ---- Issue 1. Summary: Is it possible to choose rotational direction of vertical script if I want to force them to display horizontally? From: gfb hjjhjh Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0200.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0229.html Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 2. Summary: ch and ic units From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0078.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0173.html ---- Issue 3. Summary: editorial tweaking of text link (Appendix C) From: Gérard Talbot Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0402.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 4. Summary: Add Japanese translation of CSS Writing Modes? From: Gérard Talbot Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0024.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0032.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0332.html Closed: OutOfScope / awaiting completion of translation ---- Issue 5. Summary: Margins and margin collapsing and writing modes From: Simon Pieters Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0098.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0106.html ---- Issue 6. Summary: percentage size of orthogonal box in auto-sized container resolves against ICB From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555#issuecomment-257495761 Closed: Invalid Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555#issuecomment-290103855 ---- Issue 7. Summary: definition of the central baseline From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/651 Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 8. Summary: ::first-letter and initial numbers From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/653 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/653#issuecomment-278147519 Closed: Rejected Verified: Reporter was present at F2F discussion ---- Issue 9. Summary: Propose to replace "'text-orientation: upright' to cause strong LTR" with author notes how to do it From: Koji Ishii Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/755 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0042.html ---- Issue 10. Summary: Add feature for 90deg clockwise rotation of Mongolian From: gfb hjjhjh Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0203.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0001.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion (no new features principle) ---- Issue 11. Summary: Is Old Turkic ttb or btt? From: gfb hjjhjh Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0203.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0001.html Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 12. Dup of Issue 4. ---- Issue 13. Summary: Error in Example 17 From: Gérard Talbot Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0247.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0016.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 14. Summary: Typos From: Gérard Talbot Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0402.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0007.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 15. Summary: Typesetting Mongolian upright From: Kari Pihkala Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAE0t3MztPU8yGHStYSHbZ1KvK14A2LQ1myM0VNcxMEh1S8h-bw@mail.gmail.com Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0002.html Closed: Invalid Note: Needs testcase, tracked under https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1792 ---- Issue 16. Summary: Incorrect cross-linking From: Gérard Talbot Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0008.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0041.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0017.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 17. Summary: writing-mode display changes should ref parent box not containing block From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0045.html Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1212 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1212#issuecomment-298730762 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1212#issuecomment-298734219 ---- Issue 18. Summary: percentage size of orthogonal block in auto-sized container From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555#issuecomment-257495761 Closed: Retracted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555#issuecomment-290103855 ---- Issue 19. Summary: Definition of central baseline From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/651 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/651#issuecomment-258756432 Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 20. Summary: Scope of "non-normative" section unclear From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1307 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1307#issuecomment-298725218 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1307#issuecomment-300310515 ---- Issue 21. Summary: Orthogonal FLow Constraint: viewport vs scroller From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391#issuecomment-303775875 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391#issuecomment-316529430 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391#issuecomment-320215251 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391#issuecomment-330713088 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391#issuecomment-332581365 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0001.html Verified: Reporter is editor ---- Issue 22. Summary: Computed value depends on writing-mode on elements without writing-mode From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1782 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1782#issuecomment-329025447 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0028.html ---- Issue 23. Summary: Clarify which axis is described in orthogonal flows sizing note From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1825 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1825#issuecomment-330680353 Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 24. Summary: Support direction: auto From: Binyamin Laukstein Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2091 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2091#issuecomment-351490281 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor's discretion (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2091#issuecomment-361448727) ---- Issue 25. Summary: Should max-height also limit orthogonal flows From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2239 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2239#issuecomment-361597992 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2239#issuecomment-362006700 ---- Issue 26. Summary: How do replaced elements work? From: Dennis Heuer Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0056.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0058.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0063.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0076.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0083.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 27. Summary: Merge 'direction' and 'writing-mode' properties From: Dennis Heuer Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0057.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0059.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0064.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0074.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0081.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion