Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-values-3-20160929/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Drop 3-component syntax from <position> for disambiguation From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0052.html ∈ Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/90dad9ebbc6a/css-values-3/Overview.bs Closed: Accepted Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0003.html ∈ Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0052.html ∈
Issue 2. # Summary: # multiplier is confused with * From: Simon Sapin Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/381 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/381#issuecomment-301952385 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 3. # Summary: Add comma-optional list notation From: Jarek Foksa Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/385 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/385#issuecomment-243825038 Closed: Rejected in favor of [ foo+ ]# which is functionally equivalent Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0000.html ∈
Issue 4. # Summary: When to clamp negative calc() when negative lengths not allowed From: Emilio Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/434 Open: =WG= Discuss.
Issue 5. # Summary: Ambiguous parsing of zero in <integer> | <length> From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/489 Open: =WG= Discuss.
Issue 6. # Summary: Duplicate References From: Momdo Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/559 Open: =Tab= Fix up all the bibliography badness
Issue 7. # Summary: Switch [...]! multiplier to ?? combinator From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/687 Open: =WG= Disuss.
Issue 8. # Summary: Categorize high-res screens with low-res screens, not print. From: Patrick Lauke Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708#issuecomment-260529072 Open: Edits are problematic, see Issue 13 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0085.html ∈
Issue 9. # Summary: Undefined value of rem when no root element From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/936 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/936#issuecomment-290571695 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 10. # Summary: url() missing from index From: Praveeen Puglia Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1014 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f7f942e9672b199892ba76e7bad9d8242f389f4f Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 11. # Summary: Clarify interpretation of 0 inside calc() From: Michael Giuffrida Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1114 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1114#issuecomment-287236248 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1024dc3fcd3ea9c8fb45dbec7406a6c80117b0d5 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 12. # Summary: calc() divisors should support numeric expressions From: Anthony Ramine Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1241 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1241#issuecomment-294843757 Closed: Accepted Resolved: =WG= Confirm fix.
Issue 13. # Summary: Was change intentional for print media with unusual viewing distances? From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708#issuecomment-302240095 Open: =WG= Discuss. -
Issue 14. # Summary: Restrict unitless 0 for angles to specific functions that need it From: Tab Atkins Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0027.html ∈ Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0027.html ∈