Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-css-ui-3-20150707/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ui-3/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Markup error From: Chris Rebert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0455.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0460.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 2. # Summary: Typos and grammer errors From: Timeless Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0164.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0148.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. # Summary: Clarify hit-testing for the cursor-property From: Chris Rebert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0010.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0005.html Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-test/pull/800#issuecomment-137299957 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0040.html
Issue 4. # Summary: Resize should apply to replaced elements From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0333.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0004.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0252.html
Issue 5. # Summary: Section titles do not match convention From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0299.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0072.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 6. # Summary: Missing context makes statement hard to understand From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0301.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0073.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 7. # Summary: The combinators and multipliers within the syntaxes should link to the CSS Values module From: Sebastian Zartner Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/147 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c0c700f9c8b29ba77a5861937a4097f2440ad1f2 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/147#issuecomment-223494303 Resolved: Editorial
Issue 8. # Summary: Add outline-offset to shorthand From: Yoksel Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441#issuecomment-244638068<Paste> Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441#issuecomment-248137532 Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 9. # Summary: Remove outline-color: invert From: Chrishtr Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423#issuecomment-242421803 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423#issuecomment-265858664 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0079.html
Issue 10. # Summary: Should caret-color apply to any element? From: Rego Casasnovas Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725#issuecomment-263936054 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725#issuecomment-264031876 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0123.html
Issue 11. # Summary: Allow annimation to/from caret-color:auto From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-266428994 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-266952449 Closed: Retracted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-267304148 Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 12. # Summary: Phrasing of computed value of caret-color ambiguous despite clear intent From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/741 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0123.html Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/741#issuecomment-275015837 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial