CSS Transforms Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2013-11-26 WD

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-transforms-1-20131126/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Issues list link is outdated
From:     Rick Byers
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/486
Response:
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Add more info to “Module Interactions”
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17237
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/914
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Convert to <*-percentage> notation
From:     Sebastian Zartner (SebastianZ)
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/645
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Editorial.
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Define transform list using grammar
From:     Sebastian Zartner
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAERejNZgyWKV5ioh3KR9BmYYrvpM5919D9z1Qb-LjQ5zBGOFuQ@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCB7nP+rqj7DzAef6zqMHtvoshLGMJuL7PsMi-V9qvPfw@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Clarify matrix index convention
From:     Maurizio Casimirri
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/C73D086A-A220-48E3-A3DC-6195D350C3FA@gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/924
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Confusion about multiplication
From:     Simon Sapin & Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/509FCC62.5080101@mit.edu
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/909
Open:     =ED= Make sure comments in thread are all addressed
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Application of transform to inlines
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/b464220dd959f9a9f808dd4aad85288e@gtalbot.org
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/20140210195906.GA18205@crum.dbaron.org
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/908
Open:     =ED= Propose text, add to agenda for WG resolution.
Resolved:
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Computed Style of 'transform'
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/A020C5AD-51B0-4288-8D8A-9D8322213D5B@adobe.com
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/20140325212945.GA26872@crum.dbaron.org
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/314879EA-CF63-4792-90DD-36000224B04F@adobe.com
Open:     =ED= Fixed
Resolved: Bugfix
Verified: [need a response where dbaron says it's all good now]
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Error in order of multiple transform function
From:     rosenau
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29110
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/909.
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Clarify behavior for gradientTransform and patternTransform
From:     Erik Dahlström
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/919
Open:     =Dirk= Deal. or =WG= Discuss.
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Use of “containing block” does not match CSS2.1 definition
From:     Aryeh Gregor
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16328
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/514E058C.5060105@exyr.org
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/913
Notes:    See also dbaron's message in the issue below.
Open:     =ED= Figure out what to do. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/913
Resolved: Editor discretion (or agenda+ if there's a problem)
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Spec doesn't mention establishing abspos containing block
From:     Robert O'Callahan
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/24BE3FE7-60C9-4690-A01C-F2291460DE7F@adobe.com
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/20151125002414.GA22745@pescadero.dbaron.org
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/919
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Interaction of regions and transforms and abspos/fixedpos
From:     Mihnea-Vlad Ovidenie
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CE4E28E9.4B01C%25mihnea@adobe.com
Response: =astearns= File against Regions
Closed:   Out-of-Scope
Issue 14. #
Summeray: Specify stack level of non-positioned transformed elements
From:     Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wg8psjr1bunlto@oyvinds-desktop
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/925
Changes:
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Clarify Appendix E rendering of 3D transformed descendants
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/20150904234527.GA15137@pescadero.dbaron.org
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/926
Changes:
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 16. #
Summary:  transform functions should accept percentages
From:     Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/546F5D45.6030704@mit.edu
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/A2D81F68-B51F-468C-8C10-50D435980254@adobe.com
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 17. #
Summary:  Define basis for percentage transform on patterns, gradients, clipPath
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/9B0DDCB4-B480-471F-943A-C5ED00598DFA@adobe.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/892
Open:     =WG= Discuss.
Issue 18. #
Summary:  Match SVG spec for interaction with object bounding box units
From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28385
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/922
Changes:
Open:     =ED= Edit. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/922
Resolved: Editor discretion.
Issue 19. #
Summary:  Update “transformable elements” for SVG2
From:     Nikos Andronikos
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/358
Changes:
Open:     =ED= Edit
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 20. #
Summary:  Units aren't back-compatible with old SVG
From:     Dr. Olaf Hoffman
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/201204211629.13408.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/3DCACD7B-0115-44FC-901A-A86DC1211CD1@adobe.com
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 21. #
Summary:  Unitless values
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDDDMY0czypkLQ2X8tBtLFjYn5t9g+aYOPBzXLEAGzBzA@mail.gmail.com
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDD3VfCvDfe0TEUJEd7e+JXZzhRDGTyEgdc9Hodz0pCLUQ@mail.gmail.com
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: =WG= Resolve.
Issue 22. #
Summary:  Transform syntax CSS vs SVG harmonization
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/7E680372-9199-4AF9-98A1-C7B6ECB72C87@adobe.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/88568E75-27C9-4DA4-BCD6-7459FA5D9FE4@adobe.com
Open:     Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Review.
Issue 23. #
Summary:  User coordinate space statement breaks SVG
From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAFDDJ7yhF7Qn28wVMqb7ra6N9Q=j74OTqHWpjLeYrH=LQwmd4A@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/893
Open:     =WG= Discuss.
Issue 24. #
Summary:  Issues with transform on SVG root
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/0A9D2705-9FFE-425B-B3CB-297EA97D337D@adobe.com
Open:     =SVGWG= Figure out if anything remains to be done.
Issue 25. #
Summary:  Transforms on root SVG element
From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAFDDJ7xQp+j2c+18zkRyPWPtnuk+dbVA6Dc_L7ACr-tptAGicA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/894
Open:     =WG= Discuss with SVG folks
Issue 26. #
Summary:  Use UA style sheet instead of prose for SVG transform-origin
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28000
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/20150611085235.GA3929@wok.mcc.id.au
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CE3AFDB0-D260-493A-9110-16BB01D8E28E@adobe.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/920
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 27. #
Summary:  Specs disagree on whether transform-origin's resolved value is used or computed
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/392#issuecomment-238494067
Proposal: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/392#issuecomment-269639534
Response:
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2317722f3b9165fdb7f69c990f4f3981682d31bf
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0048.html
Issue 28. #
Summary:  transform-origin relative to containing block
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698_DMux4CFD6pA2MOdK7VX9yCWJgciXE0_MuRxXAV1WMA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698unKqMTgJpVXFmRtcmcjfwEkhGfmhhk0dsZgxiQ4E6uQ@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Retracted
Issue 29. #
Summary:  Add transform-origin-x/y?
From:     Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/50648288.4050309@mit.edu
Response:
Note:     CSS Backgrounds L4 solved the logical coords problem since this thread was last discussed.
Closed:   Deferred to L2
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0048.html
          & https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Issue 30. #
Summary:  transform-origin: 0% not equivalent to 0px is confusing
From:     Cameron McCormack
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/525F2287.8050002@mcc.id.au
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/895
Open:     =WG= Discuss. (SVG)
Notes:    https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0048.html
Resolved:
Issue 31. #
Summary:  exact definition of origin argument to rotate()
From:     Rik Cabanier
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDC=oAU5XQt0E7sJ=2vcMLU1BzmH4L7EzYsfvtL-5LbHZQ@mail.gmail.com
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKA+Axk=-C3tTdoKRU3g2Be=GV3aeiNfqYot3205h6fZVP2K=w@mail.gmail.com
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDD9LftfaCqnH_oPXe78GqYv2aOdE8forTWN515=-UHRmg@mail.gmail.com
Proposal: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDAw3eU72K-QSeMVmqPjh0_wihnBf7rG4bsVsQnfVSDJ5g@mail.gmail.com
Changes:  [link to relevant section(s)]
Closed:   Invalid (rotate with > 1 argument removed)
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html.
Issue 32. #
Summary:  Unitless zero rotation
From:     Simon Fraser
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29413
Response:
Open:     =ED= Update to reference CSS Values 3 correctly.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Issue 33. #
Summary:  Make Rotation Less Weird in 3D transforms
From:     Shane Stephens
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAGTfzwT8M0_c1Wnk5To1zRVtGXtuLzXbjkpDS55DC6T9dUTfKQ@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/896
Notes:    See also zero-coord axis issue below.
Changes:
Open:     =shane= Investigate fixing quaternation algorithm per https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Resolved:
Issue 34. #
Summary:  Reduce matrix decomposition when rotation axis has zero coord
From:     Shane Stephens
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGTfzwTS9r+z1LRu=3t25NW0A6yk0b+agaH6__8ZkcSD3-LR9A@mail.gmail.com
Changes:
Open:     =ED= Edit & respond: rotate(x,x,x,0) acts like the id() function relative to other rotate functions.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Issue 35. #
Summary:  Interpolation of transform lists
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/20120719213826.GA8775@crum.dbaron.org
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/474B73CD-95F5-467B-9F39-90D7045E3A9C@adobe.com
Open:     Accepted?
Resolved: ? (dbaron unhappy with the state of the spec regarding the matching of the perspective() function)
Verified: [get verification from dbaron]
Issue 36. #
Summary:  Add null transform as placeholder for animations?
From:     CSSWG
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/523AB5BE.50406@inkedblade.net
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/898
Response:
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0048.html
Issue 37. #
Summary:  Smarter interpolation of truncated transform lists
From:     Louis-Rémi Babé
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CALXxKfCKZd+P0mH2oFyDkBgps56WqwQnLSMpKk1nrqiFXScqVA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDBPafEbiXNy=Mw4a9w1jmvK6dUJzq28PPjN7APgtjqAEw@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/927
Changes:
Open:     =shane= collect frequency data per https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0048.html
Resolved:
Issue 38. #
Summary:  Transform interpolation problem
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/20140702002134.GA26687@crum.dbaron.org
Response:
Changes:
Open:     =ED= Clarify spec & respond to dbaron: Transitions will run whenever the functions differ, even if the endpoints are functionally identical.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0048.html
          & https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Issue 39. #
Summary:  Interpolated values don't interpolate well with original start/end
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/20140226234818.GA5390@crum.dbaron.org
Changes:
Open:     =WG= Resolved
Resolved: perpective() interpolates to perspective().
Issue 40. #
Summary:  Bugs in interpolation algorithm
From:     Manish Goregaokar (Manishearth)
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/483#issuecomment-249497761
Response:
Changes:
Open:     =shane= investigate fixing algorithm per https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Resolved: Bugfix.
Issue 41. #
Summary:  Matrix Interpolation
From:     Shane Stephens
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3tF-tBQMwhOWRAYN-L+rVPhX-_xAa6ynKGa57Ue4HMywA@mail.gmail.com
Notes:    Might be further background elsewhere, didn't find it. But see below.
Response:
Changes:
Open:   Rejected =ED= Respond to thread.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Issue 42. #
Summary:  Use better matrix interpolation method
From:     Ken Shoemake
From:     Benoit Jacob
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/52CD882F.6020408@yahoo.com
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAJTmd9qXg+WAt5OK9g-pTEwHunEXxcKtvBSJ4fd_5=SmLHM-jg@mail.gmail.com
Response:
Open:     =ED= Respond that while this does look better, for web compat reasons we can't change, and we'll continue to push things that make it easier to avoid matrix interpolation.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Issue 43. #
Summary:  Matrix Decomposition
From:     Dirk Schulze
From:     Rik Cabanier
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/A54A72B2-5BFB-46F7-8B08-BE2B7A3EA8D2@adobe.com
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDBdtR1AWowudWzrj0ownknbvatv-HhC1E28_QJYSB47aQ@mail.gmail.com
Open:     Invalid =ED= Respond to explain why.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Issue 44. #
Summary:  Include Tagaki-san's definition of linear scale
From:     CSSWG
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sSRuNBNO8M_SUAp8BX7gnzCtBmmY9_bbm76xX2sU3N2g@mail.gmail.com
Open:     =ED= Make any necessary edits, respond to thread, and then close.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Issue 45. #
Summary:  getTransformToElement needs more detail
From:     CSSWG
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3t+PxH+eCXcOxiX61J_Nx+jimkttsoViSCQNDSVOTKNDQ@mail.gmail.com
Response:
Changes:
Open:     =ED= Transfer to Geometry per WG resolution
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Issue 46. #
Summary:  transform-box values & correspondance to SVG vs CSS
From:     Erik Dahlström
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/op.x5otn9g7fwt8au@localhost.localdomain
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/928
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/857
Response:
Notes:    See also https://drafts.fxtf.org/paint/#fill-origin
Open:     =WG= Discuss, and ensure alignment with FXTF Paint.
Resolved:
Issue 47. #
Summary:  Scrollbars vs. scaling down
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDX2ECLHm523xNpr8qqYgsqeU2SXiY0GvZo7S1063CoAg@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOp6jLYZ8VMPW4wNOMkH_uLPROr1ows22AFgLqMuhzQ=h89m0A@mail.gmail.com
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDfy0ghxEB5jnSTP3LMTbGo1=p=Wq5GUizw3RySS6QGJA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOp6jLYTvsqEYfUv=mfayYADuJnZKhC1vakfdqsFvrPu0Tp_7A@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: =ED= Verify.
Issue 48. #
Summary:  Impact of transforms on scrollable area (multiple threads)
From:     Robert O'Callahan
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAOp6jLbN9SjQd4zRy=BcswPxzOR5RHvvshjdQ7Xb7zfyG1V6KA@mail.gmail.com animation
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOp6jLZZrmwZ1xZG2AzF+VTzn+zFUFa0EpSXp1T-fSc7ZhNa7A@mail.gmail.com
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOp6jLbbe9PWKfiooQ-jT+0E=zAd9VRqD-XqqCNogvDVmiBxaQ@mail.gmail.com animation
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOMQ+w9LYiOQ3u=DagEKEMqSeV91RqCMnUgy5zCaZsJw0Fur7g@mail.gmail.com
Notes:    See also https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-3/#scrollable
Notes:    See also https://www.w3.org/mid/56415511.5090604@mozilla.com
Open:     =ED= Make edits per WG resolutions.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0054.html
Issue 49. #
Summary:  Apply box-shadow after transform
From:     Christian Mayer
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/56C63DB8.8080004@ChristianMayer.de
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCGcu0S3DFeetReqfb6tV9J0eQay9M3tE=NeKSLTmL8Nw@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAFDDJ7wQ77_q23i3vJJmGubM6jBiCkbgR3QJcS6VRQk0H0C=kQ@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/C095D0EA-9473-4F5C-9E2A-8F7550F31A01@me.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/56C7D1B2.4030700@inkedblade.net
Open:     Rejected?
Resolved: =WG= Discuss.
Issue 50. #
Summary:  Some cubic-bezier functions output out of range [0,1]
From:     hiikezoe
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/744
Response:
Open:     =ED= Solve or agenda+.
Resolved:
Issue 51. #
Summary:  scale 0 on non-scaling stroke
From:     Rik Cabanier
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDB29wTjx0KVOjpozGckXRevZ-JVkDnFTh1-+1v9FDkEiw@mail.gmail.com
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/201205121352.41569.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/929
Response:
Open:     ?
Resolved: ?
Issue 52. #
Summary:  Some comments on the non-scaling stroke spec text
From:     Dr. Olaf Hoffman
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/201205132051.25760.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/930
Open:     =ED= Edit, file issues, or close as necessary.
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 53. #
Summary:  skew() is messed up
From:     Dr. Olaf Hoffman
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/201203071410.51426.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/C4ADC064-7771-483F-AF81-79D6D54671B4@adobe.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/931
Open:     =WG= Discuss.
Issue 54. #
Summary:  Rendering transforms with non-invertible matrix
From:     Dr. Olaf Hoffman
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/201204221814.06054.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/930
Open:     =ED= Figure out issue. =WG= Discuss & resolve.
Issue 55. #
Summary:  animateTransform thread of unclear conclusion
From:     Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/201204261843.03940.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Continue: http://www.w3.org/mid/C3DB860D-28F2-4388-9D9E-513597FFAFE4@adobe.com
Open:     =SVGWG= Figure out if this thread is 100% handled
Resolved:
Issue 56. #
Summary:  Deprecate animateTransform
From:     Dr. Olaf Hoffman
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/86583EBE-30F0-41BD-B3E2-E6D5588BB821@adobe.com
Open:     =SVGWG= Figure this out and respond to thread.
Resolved:
Issue 57. #
Summary:  Neutral element for addition wrt animating transforms
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/24BE3FE7-60C9-4690-A01C-F2291460DE7F@adobe.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/932
Open:     =WG=/=SVGWG= Discuss.
Issue 58. #
Summary:  Transforms vs background-attachment: fixed
From:     Simon Fraser
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/42ED583F-AFF2-4D49-B20A-4335C93EEA23@me.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wgl87egg4p7avi@localhost.localdomain
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKA+AxnmG8CynocjdOQR-6WrZDa-uGwGpO74KUMBo0W2x8waWA@mail.gmail.com
Notes:    https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15833
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/933
Response:
Open:     =WG= Discuss.
Issue 59. #
Summary:  Use 'will-change' to optimize rasterization
From:     chrishtr
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/236
Response:
Changes:
Open:     =WG= Discuss.
Resolved:
Issue 60. #
Summary:  matrix() and matrix3d() should be same primitive
From:
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0048.html
Open:     =ED= Edit.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0048.html