CSS Text Decoration Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-08-01 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-css-text-decor-3-20130801/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Allow UA to skip ink by default
From:     Edward O'Connor
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/m2iositu9t.fsf@eoconnor.apple.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0088.html
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727
Changes:  None
Open
Resolved: =WG= Discuss.
Issue 2. #
Summary:  text-decoration-color doesn't handle SVG fills
From:     Tavmjong Bah
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/1400592192.22096.52.camel@localhost.localdomain
Response:
Closed:   Deferred to FXTF Paint
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Allow specifying position and thickness of underlines
From:     Lea Verou
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/9500A3A5-957D-462D-B30C-E5C548ADEB0E@verou.me
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/53BE565D.5090905@inkedblade.net
Closed:   Deferred to L4
Resolved: [New features are deferred from CRs]
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Allow arbitrary decorations
From:     Sebastian Zartner
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAERejNbMCrZiBbCSRjA_1mZ3qOZyQ9PTDoH+TxvX4gp_2eSnpg@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDB-xMb46nMf3piNNU_fcyry0hUoKh=WfPmZma3CA=c8Gg@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Rejected
Note:     Proposal is way ahead of its time; use cases may be addressed in
          future specs, unknown as yet which ones.
Resolved: [New features are deferred from CRs]
Issue 5. #
Summary:  text-shadow should apply to inline images
From:     Axel Dahmen
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/maatmk$bq8$1@ger.gmane.org
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0087.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Don't underline leading/trailing spaces
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/3A25BF98-130D-43F1-A883-90EAC8EDECB5@rivoal.net
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2b96fce8b70457a5bb04b151833ea9de5045e6a1
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com
Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Error in computed value of 'text-shadow'
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/20150326151542.GA19304@pescadero.dbaron.org
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDB9UDyk+8v53t5kDjcTsJZJ0E8BFa5RPn3nYqh1=0VgtA@mail.gmail.com
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/fe04a357105875cf26b30bf9375c8b310a517524
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 8. #
Summary:  s/above/outside/ for emphasis marks
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698Cn7Yg5+bQO8NN1YrnpZak_yXQVYRc8HUQB3OB0_x9RA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/E1CA333C-15C7-44F5-BDA1-23BBF16E5DE5@gmail.com
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9432fa2c1e8e80418bcd30538a739854d39a7bd
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Clarify position of emphasis marks over auto-hidden ruby
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698SXs+V8whY1vbp_bhXpX-jKa=pHK7f5xTt7XPTJh91bg@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAN9ydbVZBG-xtm0TjTaCO4dV5ULSyZdpZJhwibYS7miBpiTUeg@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0116.html
Open:     Waiting on Murakami-san to respond with advice.
Resolved: =WG= Discuss.
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Clarify whether emphasis marks are upright or sideways for sideways-rl/lr
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq69-O+qeoZ+_6=8ToxHuGphU1AgzcoLpHj-iKWCduKHL7Yg@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0089.html
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/aa9ae9847dcff26d80f2b4d097e0f13781f25a44
Open:     Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Review.
Issue 11. #
Summary:  UA rules for text-emphasis-position should handle Japanese within Chinese
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0311.html
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/5654DED1.8070706@inkedblade.net
Changes:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0094.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: =WG= =i18n= Review.
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Are there emphasis mark position preferences for Korean?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/5654DED1.8070706@inkedblade.net
Open
Resoved:  =i18n= Figure this out.
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Should emphasis marks use 'font-variant: ruby'?
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq69_efU_tobZe8VDYfM9qCm0ejpiajmmys5JW4h8=oAx4Lg@mail.gmail.com
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0094.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0111.html
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/22ed0ceb4192652bcee96c139326acb742b1d868
Open:     Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Review.
Issue 14. #
Summary:  'text-emphasis' shorthand should not allow only <color>
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699grzUvrZHMHW17bFCE-CamQmfeGgOHN-tB4ViKsWtqTA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699ztveczAWh1nYZekBoNFUKVz2LCiUUigUSuxV+CuT6HA@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion (based on existing CSS syntactic precedents)
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Emphasis marks per typographic character unit
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/5652E04D.6080408@w3.org
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0084.html
Open:     Accepted (waiting for css-text-3 publication update)
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 16. #
Summary:  Emphasis marks shouldn't apply to punctuation
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699v=qhkpXD8smpV0TSOW_GEt67Z4HZWmTheqhv2n+=ekw@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0083.html
Followup: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/839
Open:     =WG= =i18n= Discuss.
Issue 17. #
Summary:  'text-emphasis-position' requires too many arguments
From:     Momdo Nakamura
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/20151215203411.4682.EDA4FE4B@gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0118.html
Open:     =WG= Discuss proposal. =i18n= Verify assumptions in proposal.
Issue 18. #
Summary:  'text-underline-position' should default to 'auto' for CJK, to avoid compat issues
From:     Masayuki Nakano
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/55506D67.7060308@d-toybox.com
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/5C756B1C-F03B-4CA7-8796-7A6EEBC34C32@apple.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0144.html
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c7ca2e5cf82ddb73a8e58484eeee21750fd32d2e
Open:     =WG= Review changes, decide whether 'text-underline-position: right' should also default to 'auto'.
Issue 19. #
Summary:  'text-underline-position' UA rules don't handle non-CJK inside CJK
From:     Myles Maxfield
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0210.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0092.html
Changes:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0094.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 20. #
Summary:  Module needs update to handle new sideways-lr/sideways-rl writing modes
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/56E86D82.10606@inkedblade.net
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0119.html
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/aa9ae9847dcff26d80f2b4d097e0f13781f25a44
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: =WG= =i18n= Review.
Issue 21. #
Summary:  Specify interaction of text-decoration, text-emphasis, and ruby
From:     Momdo Nakamura
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698GTMUd=OBrgaFLcNYWhMdmOtaYa6D-8OrGSbxZZDaibw@mail.gmail.com
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f205ff9dc6b969d015aa37c710b32d3845f137c9
Open:     =WG= =i18n= Review.
Issue 22. #
Summary:  CJK vs. skipping ink
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/707
Open:     =WG= Discuss.
Issue 23. #
Summary:  ???
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/799
Duplicate of 24?
Issue 24. #
Summary:  line-throughs vs. skipping ink
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/711
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/711#issuecomment-268594411
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6d37258d4696972886a18f2298488cf94800060a
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3vcLHbfAhsZi8OCT+kuQOuxt_qH4rimVTewkvNR=SUi=Q@mail.gmail.com
Issue 25. #
Summary:  Position of underline should depend on skipped things
From:     Dave Hyatt
Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/3ADFB47B-FE63-4820-A602-D3BABFF6126F@apple.com
Open:     =WG= Discuss.
Issue 26. #
Summary:  text-decoration-skip should have keyword for complex initial value
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727
Open:     =WG= Discuss.
Issue 27. #
Summary:  underline-becoming-line-through note is confusing
From:     Hiroshi Sakakibara
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160#issuecomment-224203512
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160#issuecomment-269328826
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0ff76a5ed7ce0e6de7c17ec4b7a357f56fcab3f0
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Discuss.