The FCC just voted to kill net neutrality. Congress can still stop it.

CSS Image Values and Replaced Content Level 3 Disposition of Comments

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-images-20120112/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1.
Summary:  Use linear RGB for gradients
From:     Witold Baryluk
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0607.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0617.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0635.html
Issue 2.
Summary:  Don't use prepositions in linear-gradient()
From:     Robert Biggs
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0720.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0783.html
Comment:  (private mail - accepted resolution for radial-gradient, but
           didn't accept it for linear-gradient)
Note:     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Aug/0271.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0384.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0387.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0549.html
Issue 3.
Summary:  Use of 'bounding box' is undefined, should be 'border box'
From:     Leif Arne Storset
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0033.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1386.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1399.html
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 4.
Summary:  'element reference identifier' underdefined
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0253.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 5.
Summary:  The element() cycle detection algo phrasing implies an incremental
          algorithm.
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0251.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0269.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 6.
Summary:  The element() cycle detection algo misses cycles caused by
          host-language elements.
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0254.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0270.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 7.
Summary:  The term "paint sources" is insufficiently defined, and should
          have explicit definitions for HTML and SVG.
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0252.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0264.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 8.
Summary:  HTML's definition of "paint source" only exists in the WHATWG
          version of HTML5, so it should be directly linked to.
From:     Leif Arne Storset
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0267.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0271.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 9.
Summary:  'image-orientation' should be applied before any other transformations
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0404.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0517.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 10.
Summary:  Concrete Object Size resolution algorithm has clumsy text,
          implying that only one dimension is resolved in one of the steps
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0395.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0518.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 11.
Summary:  element() examples still used old IDENT syntax.
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0394.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0519.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 12.
Summary:  specify element() behavior when the selector matches multiple elements
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0394.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0519.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 13.
Summary:  specify that relative image() urls compute to absolute
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0393.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0696.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 14.
Summary:  image() shouldn't require implementations to support Media Fragments
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0388.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1049.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1102.html
Closed:   Partially Accepted - keep requirement, but add a generalized form
          of the commenter's idea as well, as suggested by fantasai
Issue 15.
Summary:  Better define how image-orientation interacts with EXIF data
From:     Simon Fraser
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0311.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0877.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 16.
Summary:  Gradients shouldn't transition using premultiplied alpha.
From:     Rik Cabanier
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1071.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1081.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1090.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1084.html
Issue 17.
Summary:  element() function should move to the next level of Images
From:     Simon Fraser
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0324.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0347.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 18.
Summary:  Define 'dpi' and 'dpcm' in terms of the real physical units,
          not the CSS units
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0408.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0430.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20120222#l-80
Issue 19.
Summary:  Several typos
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0408.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0430.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 20.
Summary:  It's unclear if image-resolution is supposed to apply to images
          specified in CSS
From:     Simon Fraser
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0323.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0329.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 21.
Summary:  The spec points to Values & Units for a definition of <position>,
          but it's not defined there.
From:     Lea Verou
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0950.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1106.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1107.html
Issue 22.
Summary:  There should be a non-example reference to CSSElementMap
From:     Simon Fraser
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0268.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0266.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 23.
Summary:  Wording of 'object-fit:fill' seems to imply that the content box
          *must* be filled
From:     Leif Arne Storset
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0034.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0099.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 24.
Summary:  'object-fit:cover/contain' contain seemingly redundant text
From:     Leif Arne Storset
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0036.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0098.html
Note:     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011May/0638.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1122.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0517.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0525.html
Issue 25.
Summary:  "Concentric ellipses" is imprecise
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1361.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1375.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: XXX NEEDS REVIEW
Issue 26.
Summary:  specify alignment of varying-size pages for broken element()
From:     fantasai
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 27.
Summary:  Allow image() to accept element()
From:     TabAtkins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1143.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 28.
Summary:  Use of <svg> as a paint source
From:     Erik Dahlstrom
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1124.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1131.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1137.html
Closed:   Rejected+Deferred
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 29.
Summary:  Clarify "not rendered"
From:     Erik Dahlstrom
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1124.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1137.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1265.html
Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1330.html
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 30.
Summary:  Style resolution of elements not in document
From:     Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1256.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1268.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1269.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1278.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1279.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1288.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1350.html
Closed:   ???
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1356.html
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 31.
Summary:  Define precisely how SVG paint servers are used as paint sources
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html (bottom)
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1265.html (bottom)
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1330.html (bottom)
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 32.
Summary:  objectBoundingBox and userSpaceOnUse are defined to be identical
Note:     raised against edits resulting from other issues, not against LC
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1296.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1304.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1305.html
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 33.
Summary:  aliasing of object-fit/object-position
From:     Erik Dahlstrom
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1126.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1127.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0518.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0526.html
Issue 34.
Summary:  element() and 3D Transforms
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1294.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1297.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1325.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1334.html
Closed:   Deferred to Level 4.
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 35.
Summary:  GCPM element() and Images element()
From:     fantasai / Håkon Lie
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1430.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1433.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0012.html
Closed:   Deferred to Level 4
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 36.
Summary:  Clarify scope of required Media Fragments support for image()
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0152.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0493.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 37.
Summary:  ltr/rtl annotations should be per image() not per URL
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0243.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0519.html
Closed:   Deferred to Level 4
Deferred: The directional images feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 38.
Summary:  Default object size for replaced elements is incorrect
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0336.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0339.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 39.
Summary:  Concrete object size should link to algorithm
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0337.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0342.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 40.
Summary:  Editorial comments on linear-gradient()
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0338.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0341.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 41.
Summary:  Combine directional images into image-orientation
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0397.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0513.html
Note:     See also Issue 37
Closed:   Deferred to Level 4
Deferred: The directional images feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 42.
Summary:  image-orientation should inherit
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0397.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0513.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 43.
Summary:  Handling of negative color stops unclear
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0357.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0372.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0378.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0380.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0393.html
Issue 44.
Summary:  Clarifications to intrinsic sizing terminology
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0358.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0414.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0496.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 45.
Summary:  Define closest aspect ratio more precisely
From:     Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0402.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0498.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0527.html
Issue 46.
Summary:  Accessibility Review
From:     Michael Cooper
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0361.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0366.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0368.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 47.
Summary:  Interaction of object-fit and default sizing algorithm is messy
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0363.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0425.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0577.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 48.
Summary:  SVG with one intrinsic dimension and an aspect ratio
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0364.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0415.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0496.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 49.
Summary:  object-fit's resizing behavior doesn't account for mixed min/max constraints
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0369.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0370.html
Closed:   Invalid via Issue 24 edits
Issue 50.
Summary:  image-orientation application unclear wrt background / 'content' images
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0388.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0412.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 51.
Summary:  Capitalization of MAY inconsistent
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0389.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0413.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 52.
Summary:  Editorial clarification to concrete object size determination
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0365.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0550.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 53.
Summary:  Remove out-of-document element references feature
From:     Tab Atkins and fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0477.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0487.html
Closed:   Accepted