Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140925/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Use preferred size instead of max-content size From: Tab Atkins Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0385.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0424.html Closed: OutOfScope Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 2. # Summary: Flex item handling of anonymous boxes should be normative From: Alan Stearns Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0265.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0268.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0269.html Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 3. # Summary: Editorial nits From: Alan Stearns Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0267.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0431.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 4. # Summary: Alignment shouldn't depend on number of lines, but on wrappability From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0489.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0341.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0004.html
Issue 5. # Summary: Clarify sizing of abspos flex containers From: François Remy Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0396.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0191.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 6. # Summary: Error in stretch definition From: Greg Whitworth Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0429.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0430.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 7. # Summary: Alias no-wrap to nowrap From: Tab Atkins Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0188.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0581.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0581.html Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 8. # Summary: Error in flex container max-content definition From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0443.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0340.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 9. # Summary: Scaled flex shrink factor should multiply by outer, not inner, base size From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0417.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0495.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 10. # Summary: Revert 'flex-basis: auto' rename, add 'content' value instead From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0023.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0342.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0401.html Followup: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0346.html
Issue 11. # Summary: Clarify that flex layout is writing-mode relative From: Addison Phillips Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0058.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0344.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 12. # Summary: Example should state general case, put specific in parens, not vice versa From: Addison Phillips Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0060.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0343.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editorial
Issue 13. # Summary: Why are there sheep? From: Addison Phillips Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0059.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0064.html Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editorial
Issue 14. # Summary: 'flex' section needs editorial love From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0066.html Closed: Invalid Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 15. # Summary: Stray references to old spec prose From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0078.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0089.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 16. #
Summary: 'order' should affect speech/navigation order
From: Bo Campbell
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0119.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0121.html
Closed: Rejected
Note: WG still open to further discussion on solving the relevant concerns,
will follow up
Issue 17. # Summary: Forced flex line breaking controls From: Glen Huang Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0322.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0336.html Closed: Deferred
Issue 18. # Summary: Spec conflicts with itself on interpretation of break controls From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0349.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0263.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 19. # Summary: Blink refuses to implement percentage-margin change From: Tab Atkins Jr. Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html Note: Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid. Open Note: Issue noted, pending later discussion
Issue 20. # Summary: Definite flexed size requires definite flex container main size From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0022.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 21. # Summary: Clarify that flex base size doesn't include min/max clamping From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0377.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0428.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 22. # Summary: Clarify whether layout is required for min/max-content sizing. From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0049.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0044.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 23. # Summary: Should justify-self:stretch compute to flex-start, or just act like it? From: Javier Fernandez Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0247.html Closed: OutOfScope Note: Filed against CSS Align
Issue 24. # Summary: Static position of an abspos child of a flex container is confusingly defined From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0137.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0047.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 25. # Summary: min-width:auto shouldn't take definite flex-basis into account From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0038.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0063.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 26. # Summary: Some "flex basis" links are wrong From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0534.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0264.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial