Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-flexbox-1-20160526/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Scrollable overflow vs alignment From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0107.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0109.html ∈ Closed: Accepted Notes: Fixed in css-align-3 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ea5c14795ccf05786ab1b1c45e80d7c9d4841bdf Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 2. # Summary: Add property for switching keyboarding order DOM vs flex order From: Léonie Watson Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0119.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0123.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0124.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0125.html ∈ Closed: OutOfScope Notes: Refiled on css-ui-4 as https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1764 Notes: See previous discussions on a11y vs layout reordering e.g. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0347.html ∈ and https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#flow-order https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#order-accessibility
Issue 3. # Summary: min-height vs border-box sizing From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0163.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0164.html ∈ Closed: Invalid Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0173.html ∈
Issue 4. # Summary: Add justify-content: space-evenly From: Bejamin Strauß Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0034.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0035.html ∈ Closed: OutOfScope Notes: Already added through CSS Box Alignment module.
Issue 5. # Summary: Percentage margins for intrinsic sizing From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0061.html ∈ Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/359 (duped to 347) Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/347 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/347#issuecomment-319662029 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0036.html ∈
Issue 6. # Summary: Definiteness of flex items’ main size depending on flex-basis From: Sam Sneddon Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0068.html ∈ Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-324140324 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0026.html ∈ Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-327643730 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-327828487
Issue 7. # Summary: Spec lists incorrect initial value for 'flex' From: xgq frms From: philix From: raphaelgoetter Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0030.html ∈ Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/183 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/634 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0034.html ∈ Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/183#issuecomment-227652791 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/634#issuecomment-255542169 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix Notes: =TF= Follow up to OP once update hits /TR
Issue 8. # Summary: Flexbox spec currently has "Printer" as its title From: dholbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/182 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/182#issuecomment-225712448 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 9. # Summary: block-axis baselines From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/197 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/197#issuecomment-248331296 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0076.html ∈
Issue 10. # Summary: More precise definition of baseline-alignment sizing impact From: François Remy Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372#issuecomment-237375117 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372#issuecomment-237377783
Issue 11. # Summary: Intrinsic Sizing Algo forgets to clamp by min size From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/361 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/361#issuecomment-280448350 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix Verified: =biesi= Review.
Issue 12. # Summary: 'auto' keyword missing from flex-basis From: p2227 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329#issuecomment-233586411 Closed: Invalid Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329#event-728412033
Issue 13. # Summary: baseline-alignment fallback should be start not flex-start From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/332 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/332#issuecomment-277107165 Closed: Invalid Verified: reporter is editor
Issue 14. # Summary: Error in axis-mapping table From: funorpain Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/205 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/29e6b0adab5cc559202f7fd321c620b17e6046b1 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 15. # Summary: Absolute ratio flex impossible with margins/padding From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/316 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0036.html ∈ Verified: Reporter is editor
Issue 16A. # Summary: Baselines of empty boxes and other cases of baseline synthesis From: François Remy Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373#issuecomment-242863486 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373#issuecomment-244829198 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0000.html ∈
Issue 16B. # Summary: Baselines of empty boxes From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/439 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/439#issuecomment-246571933 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0028.html ∈
Issue 17. # Summary: Error in example: s/align-content/align-self/ From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/436 Closed: Accepted Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/e377000a95363800f3d945358aee80eea2daade6 Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 18. # Summary: Static position not following hypothetical position loses use cases From: jlukic Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/401 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/401#issuecomment-286486848 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/401#issuecomment-288471456 Closed: Objection Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0072.html ∈
Issue 19A. # Summary: Computing out align-self auto is problematic From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-244791183 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-244824005 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-247595259 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0041.html ∈
Issue 19B. # Summary: Why changing static position when align-self: auto? From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-268110480 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-280459999 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0001.html ∈
Issue 19C. # Summary: Ambiguous lookup for align-self: auto From: Emilio Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-281680347 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-282097463 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 20. # Summary: Flex properties applying to table wrapper box From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547#issuecomment-277108563 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547#issuecomment-278414959 From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/948 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/948#issuecomment-277320547 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0046.html ∈
Issue 21. # Summary: Errors in update to align-self: auto From: Javier Fernandez Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/644 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 22. # Summary: Define 'align-content: space-between' for one line in multiline flex From: markbrown Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/718 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/718#issuecomment-263037457 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 23. # Summary: Typo From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/792 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/792#issuecomment-280439482 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 24. # Summary: Missing terminology definitions for flex container axes From: Sam Sneddon Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981#issuecomment-280451297 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981#issuecomment-280456508
Issue 25. # Summary: Baseline alignment using visual or logical “first” item? From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995#issuecomment-281750174 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995#issuecomment-282100035 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0001.html ∈
Issue 26. # Summary: Computed values seem wrong From: Javier Fernandez Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1095 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1095#issuecomment-292630500 Closed: Invalid
Issue 27. # Summary: Flex and Grid images size differently From: François Remy Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112#issuecomment-321915494 Closed: Retracted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112#issuecomment-322848926
Issue 28. # Summary: Implementations don't match flex container intrinsic main sizes algo From: Tab Atkins Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1147 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1147#issuecomment-290523764 Closed: Invalid Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1147#issuecomment-327625337
Issue 29. # Summary: Partial Implementations of align-self values From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1167 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1167#issuecomment-292621161 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/55a77e02361725b3b00347fce599d48eea7136af Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0046.html ∈
Issue 30. # Summary: Missing cross-links From: Fuqiao Xue Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1230 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1230#issuecomment-315931608 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 31. # Summary: Single line multi-line flex containers don't obey align-content From: yisibl Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1268 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1268#issuecomment-296102175 Closed: Invalid Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1268#issuecomment-296143738
Issue 32. # Summary: flex-shrink with nested flex containers From: François Remy Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1290 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1290#issuecomment-297150175 Closed: Retracted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1290#event-1067611869
Issue 33. # Summary: Stack level of static flex/grid items with z-index From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1312 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1312#issuecomment-298202507 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1312#issuecomment-298202507
Issue 34. # Summary: Non-interop with shrinking and growing images From: Jen Simmons Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1322 Open Note: Being deferred to next editing cycle to allow more in-depth discussion. Note: Be sure to file testcases
Issue 35. # Summary: Control over spacing between flex items From: Keith Grant Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1324 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1324#issuecomment-311176689 Closed: Deferred to L2 Notes: See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/592 Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 36. # Summary: Improve definition linking for max-content contributions From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1419 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1419#issuecomment-315930973 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 37. # Summary: Empty flex items contribute 0 even with specified size From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1435 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0026.html ∈
Issue 38. # Summary: 'order' should not apply to abspos children of a flexbox From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1439 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1439#issuecomment-315929444 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0351.html ∈
Issue 39. # Summary: ::before/::after as flex items From: Cameron McCormack Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1591 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1591#issuecomment-314351468 Closed: Invalid
Issue 40. # Summary: Changes list links to outdated spec prose in other modules From: SelenIT Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1595 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1595#issuecomment-314877117 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1595#issuecomment-315925684 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editorial
Issue 41. # Summary: Confusing wording in accessibility note From: Tantek Çelik Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677#issuecomment-319906682 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677#issuecomment-320231369
Issue 42. # Summary: Intrinsic sizing with ∑flex < 1 is broken From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-329218845 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-331318337 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-332259616 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-332671797 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0012.html ∈ Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-334855598
Issue 43. # Summary: Rename “Implied Minimum Size” section to “Automatic Minimum Size” From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1780 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1780#issuecomment-327593455 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 44. # Summary: Confusion over content size vs transferred size of images. From: AmeliaBR Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/694 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/694#issuecomment-315920507 Closed: OutOfScope Note: Refiled as https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1609
Issue 45. # Summary: Clarify sentence construction in finding max-content flex fraction From: Alan Stearns Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1803 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1803#issuecomment-329247658 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 46. # Summary: Restore deleted def for auto min size w/o specified size or aspect ratio From: Shing Lyu Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/671 Response: https://github.com/shinglyu/csswg-drafts/commit/7d64cfb5c3ad1cabacc3e0d00f72c3717d2a1ef3 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix