Dated Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-flexbox-1-20150514/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: min/max-content sizes of flex containers incorrectly defined From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0429.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0189.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 2. # Summary: Should min/max-content sizes of flex containers include flex-basis? From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0007.html Closed: Retracted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 3. # Summary: Can percentages resolve given min-size: auto? From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0031.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0205.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0014.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html Verified: reporter participated in task force that proposed resolution
Issue 4. # Summary: Quirks mode percentage size resolution, 'flex: 1', and intrinsic heights From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0027.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0232.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 5. # Summary: Static position of abspos incompatible with css-align definition From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0357.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0018.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0142.html Verified: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20151202#l-49
Issue 6. # Summary: Do flex item determination before anonymous box fixup. From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0246.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 7. # Summary: Clarify % margin/padding behavior From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0052.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0190.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 8. # Summary: Add a11y requirements to authoring tools From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0180.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0348.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 9. # Summary: Editorial Comments From: timeless Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0075.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0085.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0344.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0346.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 10. # Summary: Broken Styling From: Ryan Prichard Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0020.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0027.html Closed: Accepted Note: Bug appears to have disappeared? Resolved: Editorial
Issue 11. # Summary: Blink objects to percentage-margin change From: Tab Atkins Jr. Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html Note: Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid. Closed: Accepted Notes: Amended spec to allow both behaviors, as the CSSWG had no consensus. Verified: reporter is editor Minutes: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0113.html Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html
Issue 12. # Summary: Intrinsic Cross size of flex container totally wrong From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0253.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0055.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 13. # Summary: Revert omitted flex-basis 0 -> 0% change From fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0429.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 14. # Summary: Use first available baseline instead of first item's baseline From: timeless Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0345.html Response: Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html
Issue 15. # Summary: Add a tab-order property From: Bo Campbell Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0285.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0347.html Closed: Rejected
Issue 16. # Summary: Are abspos whose containing block is flexbox affected by % resolution change? From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0154.html Open: Depends on issue #11 Note: WG appears to lean towards consistency within grid/flex over consistency within abspos
Issue 18. # Summary: Minimum spacing between flex items vs. around flex items From: Den Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0108.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0109.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0151.html Closed: Deferred
Issue 19. # Summary: Blockify internal table elements instead of wrapping them in anonymous boxes From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0246.html Response: Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 20. # Summary: Applies-to error for justify-items From: Javier Fernandez Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0413.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0425.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 21. # Summary: Interaction of min-height: auto and scrollbars From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0022.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0023.html Closed: Question Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0024.html
Issue 22. # Summary: Editorial comments From: timeless Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0075.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0085.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0344.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0346.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 23. # Summary: Typo? From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0224.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0225.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 24. # Summary: Breaking lines at max-height/width not defined From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0099.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0021.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 25. # Summary: <textarea> as flex container From: John Waterson Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0115.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0116.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0024.html Closed: OutOfScope
Issue 26. # Summary: Percentages resolving against definite max-height From: Tab and fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0067.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0029.html Closed: Invalid Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0029.html
Issue 27. # Summary: Fragmentation rule forces break-inside: avoid From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0163.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html Verified: Reporter is spec editor