CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2014-09-25 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140925/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Use preferred size instead of max-content size
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0385.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0424.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Flex item handling of anonymous boxes should be normative
From:     Alan Stearns
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0265.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0268.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0269.html
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Editorial nits
From:     Alan Stearns
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0267.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0431.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Alignment shouldn't depend on number of lines, but on wrappability
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0489.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0341.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0004.html
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Clarify sizing of abspos flex containers
From:     Fran├žois Remy
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0396.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0191.html
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Error in stretch definition
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0429.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0430.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Alias no-wrap to nowrap
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0188.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0581.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0581.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Error in flex container max-content definition
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0443.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0340.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Scaled flex shrink factor should multiply by outer, not inner, base size
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0417.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0495.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Revert 'flex-basis: auto' rename, add 'content' value instead
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0023.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0342.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0401.html
Followup: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0346.html
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Clarify that flex layout is writing-mode relative
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0058.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0344.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Example should state general case, put specific in parens, not vice versa
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0060.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0343.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Why are there sheep?
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0059.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0064.html
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 14. #
Summary:  'flex' section needs editorial love
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0066.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: reporter is spec editor
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Stray references to old spec prose
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0078.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0089.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 16. #
Summary:  'order' should affect speech/navigation order
From:     Bo Campbell
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0119.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0121.html
Closed:   Rejected
Note:     WG still open to further discussion on solving the relevant concerns,
          will follow up
Issue 17. #
Summary:  Forced flex line breaking controls
From:     Glen Huang
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0322.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0336.html
Closed:   Deferred
Issue 18. #
Summary:  Spec conflicts with itself on interpretation of break controls
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0349.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0263.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 19. #
Summary:  Blink refuses to implement percentage-margin change
From:     Tab Atkins Jr.
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html
Note:     Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid.
Open
Note:     Issue noted, pending later discussion
Issue 20. #
Summary:  Definite flexed size requires definite flex container main size
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0022.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 21. #
Summary:  Clarify that flex base size doesn't include min/max clamping
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0377.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0428.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 22. #
Summary:  Clarify whether layout is required for min/max-content sizing.
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0049.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0044.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 23. #
Summary:  Should justify-self:stretch compute to flex-start, or just act like it?
From:     Javier Fernandez
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0247.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Note:     Filed against CSS Align
Issue 24. #
Summary:  Static position of an abspos child of a flex container is confusingly defined
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0137.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0047.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 25. #
Summary:  min-width:auto shouldn't take definite flex-basis into account
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0038.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0063.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 26. #
Summary:  Some "flex basis" links are wrong
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0534.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0264.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial