Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140325/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Which size do percentage heights on flex items resolve against? From: Greg Whitworth Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0062.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0073.html Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editor's discretion
Issue 2. # Summary: Typos From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0090.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0091.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0100.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. # Summary: Excessive recalculation of free space From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0097.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0098.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0099.html Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 4. # Summary: Mishandling of zero free space From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0106.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0113.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 5. # Summary: Change 'flex' animatability to "yes, always" From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0169.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0175.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 6. # Summary: Use inline size for block-axis percentage padding From: Christian Biesinger Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0184.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0015.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0373.html
Issue 7. # Summary: Alternate wording for resolving flex lengths From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0223.html Closed: Retracted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0252.html
Issue 8. # Summary: Alternate wording for resolving flex lengths Take II From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0253.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0398.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0026.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0027.html Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html Note: Current spec has both variants available for review.
Issue 9. # Summary: Better handling of max-height on flex containers From: Greg Whitworth Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0292.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0293.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0294.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0297.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0373.html
Issue 10. # Summary: Regression in flex resolution algorithm From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0311.html Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0397.html Closed: Accepted Verified: (In IRC) Resolved: Editor's discretion
Issue 11. # Summary: Missing negation in description of 'auto' From: Greg Whitworth Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0430.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0016.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 12. # Summary: Clarify impact of alignment properties on abspos items From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0043.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0380.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Roughly resolved at WG discussion at Seoul F2F
Issue 13. #
Summary: Make 'flex-basis: auto' compute through to main size property value
From: Tab Atkins
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0046.html
Note: This was discussed earlier, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0029.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0192.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: WG member comment
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0056.html
Issue 14. # Summary: Editorial comments From: Alan Stearns Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0057.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0195.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 15. # Summary: Editorial simplification of flex distribution step From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0169.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0197.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 16. # Summary: Min-height tweak to skip intrinsic aspect ratio items From: Greg Whitworth Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0177.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0011.html Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/53F3B6E3.50903@inkedblade.net Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 17. # Summary: Typo From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0424.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0425.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 18. # Summary: min-size: auto rules should be main-axis specific From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0074.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0076.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 19. # Summary: min-size: auto should reference 'width' only for flex-basis: auto From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0459.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0007.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion Open: NEEDS MORE REVIEW
Issue 20. # Summary: Need keyword for 'auto' flex-basis, which no longer = max-content Proposal: Rename 'auto' to something else, make 'auto' the auto keyword. Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0008.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0051.html
Issue 21. # Summary: Cross-size of stretched flex size should be definite if flexbox is def From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0040.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0012.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Was already fixed in previous LC! Verified:
Issue 22. # Summary: Advise authors to reorder focus order together with box order From: PFWG Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0247.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0256.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
Issue 23. # Summary: Masonry effect From: JK Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0046.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0053.html Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
Issue 24. # Summary: More precise definition for stretched items. From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0455.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0456.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0458.html Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 25. # Summary: Add flex-wrap: balance From: Cory Brown Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0099.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0100.html Closed: Deferred Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
Issue 26. # Summary: Better handling of main-axis percentages From: John Rimmer Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0290.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0010.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 27. # Summary: Intrinsic sizes vs. percentage children From: fantasai and Tab Atkins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0009.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0383.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
Issue 28. # Summary: Clarify "any definite size constraints" From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0053.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0268.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0270.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0271.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0273.html
Issue 29. # Summary: Possible typo in main-size keyword conversion From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0125.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0274.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 30. # Summary: Restrict min-size: auto overflow check to appropriate axis From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0317.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0319.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 31. # Summary: Question wrt interaction of text wrapping and flex wrapping From: Richard Dodd Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0395.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0440.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 32. # Summary: What is the flexbox height when computed height is indefinite? From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0438.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0283.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 33. # Summary: Shrinkwrapping of block-level flex containers undefined/suboptimal From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0502.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html
Issue 34. # Summary: Overflow directions should relate to content ordering From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0380.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0285.html Closed: OutOfScope Note: Accepted edits into CSS Box Alignment instead.
Issue 35. # Summary: min-content default problematic for scroll root descendants From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0589.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0282.html Closed: Rejected Verified:
Issue 36. # Summary: Should intrinsic aspect ratio be considered? Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0609.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0616.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0042.html Closed: Invalid Verified:
Issue 37. # Summary: Error in application of intrinsic ratio From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0098.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0288.html Closed: Invalid Verified:
Issue 38. # Summary: Clarify non-application of ::first-line/::first-letter From: Tab Atkins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 39. # Summary: max-content definition is wrong From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0277.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
Issue 40. # Summary: Back-compat concerns with Issue 20 renaming of 'auto' From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0160.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0381.html Open: Closed as no change for now, but requesting more feedback during LC.