Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-flexbox-20120612/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 0. # Summary: Make spec understandable to authors From: Daniel Glazman Comment: at Hamburg F2F Closed: Accepted
Issue 1. # Summary: min-width and min-height as auto in both axes? From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FD665E2.3000101@mozilla.com Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0696.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 2. # Summary: Handling replaced inlines as flex items From: CSSWG Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCWMOtPM1HUoo8wdA7nw1xSo3dnj0e3i50vq+eVh4txKw@mail.gmail.com Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDfJ9_zFpRwf-2dbHhOByQ6QY8Lmszggga6c_-kFUM7Rg@mail.gmail.com Closed: Accepted
Issue 3. # Summary: order property and accessibility From: fantasai Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FE24E10.4000501@inkedblade.net Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0046.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 4. # Summary: order might be too generic of a name From: fantasai Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FBD8B99.4090101@inkedblade.net Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0442.html Closed: Rejected
Issue 5. # Summary: Paint flex items atomically? From: Morten Stenshorne Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/874npvizer.fsf@aeneas.oslo.osa Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0382.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0384.html
Issue 6. # Summary: Improve algorithm for hypothetical main size From: Alex Mogilevsky Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/2C86A15F63CD734EB1D846A0BA4E0FC823CBFC16@CH1PRD0310MB381.namprd03.prod.outlook.com Response: [none required] Closed: Accepted
Issue 7. # Summary: Flexing prose is confusing From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FEC67B5.2060300@csail.mit.edu Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0700.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0383.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 8. # Summary: Handling <percentage> sizes in an indefinite-size container From: Sławomir Domagała Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0029.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0097.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 9. # Summary: Have align-items follow align-content by default From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0056.html Response: [none needed] Closed: Rejected Verified: [commenter is editor]
Issue 10. #
Summary: Flex-flow should affect default block-level alignment of flex container
in place of containing block's 'direction'
From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0072.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0077.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0095.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Aug/0003.html
Issue 11. # Summary: Clarifications to Chapter 4 From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0078.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0094.html Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF46774.6080404@csail.mit.edu Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0222.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 12. # Summary: Use min-size instead of basis for line breaking when size is auto From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0084.html Response: [none needed] Closed: Rejected Verified: [commenter is editor]
Issue 13. # Summary: wrap-reverse is confusing From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF46280.4080900@csail.mit.edu Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0161.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0173.html
Issue 14. # Summary: visibility: collapse should redo line-breaking From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF46931.30407@csail.mit.edu Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF50153.8040801@inkedblade.net Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Aug/0003.html
Issue 15. # Summary: sign error in algorithm From: Florian Rivoal Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wgy5uau14p7avi@localhost.localdomain Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0205.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 16. # Summary: Should z-index Just Work on flex items? From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0190.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 17. # Summary: Does 'order' affect abspos placeholders? From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0167.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 18. # Summary: Absolutely-positioned flex items should not affect layout in flex container From: John Hax Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0262.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0419.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 19. # Summary: Flexbox needs examples with different writing modes From: i18nWG Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0269.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0272.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0273.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0275.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 20. # Summary: Baseline determination underdefined From: i18nWG Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0271.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0274.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 21. # Summary: Tables as flex items underdefined From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0385.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 22. # Summary: Missing 'order' edit to <integer> From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/50096C12.3010908@mozilla.com Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0607.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 23. Summary: Accessibility comments on Flexbox From: PFWG Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2012JulSep/0049.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0281.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 24. Summary: Baseline alignment of inline-flex with overflow From: Morten Stenshorne Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0403.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0069.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0096.html
Issue 25. Summary: Awkward flex ratio terminology From: L. David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0356.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0116.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 26. Summary: Clarify parsing of unitless zero in 'flex' shorthand From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0216.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0300.html Closed: Accepted