The FCC just voted to kill net neutrality. Congress can still stop it.

CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2012-06-12 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-flexbox-20120612/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 0. #
Summary:  Make spec understandable to authors
From:     Daniel Glazman
Comment:  at Hamburg F2F
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 1. #
Summary:  min-width and min-height as auto in both axes?
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FD665E2.3000101@mozilla.com
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0696.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Handling replaced inlines as flex items
From:     CSSWG
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCWMOtPM1HUoo8wdA7nw1xSo3dnj0e3i50vq+eVh4txKw@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDfJ9_zFpRwf-2dbHhOByQ6QY8Lmszggga6c_-kFUM7Rg@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 3. #
Summary:  order property and accessibility
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FE24E10.4000501@inkedblade.net
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0046.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 4. #
Summary:  order might be too generic of a name
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FBD8B99.4090101@inkedblade.net
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0442.html
Closed:   Rejected
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Paint flex items atomically?
From:     Morten Stenshorne
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/874npvizer.fsf@aeneas.oslo.osa
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0382.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0384.html
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Improve algorithm for hypothetical main size
From:     Alex Mogilevsky
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/2C86A15F63CD734EB1D846A0BA4E0FC823CBFC16@CH1PRD0310MB381.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
Response: [none required]
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Flexing prose is confusing
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FEC67B5.2060300@csail.mit.edu
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0700.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0383.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Handling <percentage> sizes in an indefinite-size container
From:     Sławomir Domagała
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0029.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0097.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Have align-items follow align-content by default
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0056.html
Response: [none needed]
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: [commenter is editor]
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Flex-flow should affect default block-level alignment of flex container
          in place of containing block's 'direction'
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0072.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0077.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0095.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Aug/0003.html
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Clarifications to Chapter 4
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0078.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0094.html
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF46774.6080404@csail.mit.edu
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0222.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Use min-size instead of basis for line breaking when size is auto
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0084.html
Response: [none needed]
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: [commenter is editor]
Issue 13. #
Summary:  wrap-reverse is confusing
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF46280.4080900@csail.mit.edu
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0161.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0173.html
Issue 14. #
Summary:  visibility: collapse should redo line-breaking
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF46931.30407@csail.mit.edu
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF50153.8040801@inkedblade.net
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Aug/0003.html
Issue 15. #
Summary:  sign error in algorithm
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wgy5uau14p7avi@localhost.localdomain
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0205.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 16. #
Summary:  Should z-index Just Work on flex items?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0190.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 17. #
Summary:  Does 'order' affect abspos placeholders?
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0167.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 18. #
Summary:  Absolutely-positioned flex items should not affect layout in flex container
From:     John Hax
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0262.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0419.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 19. #
Summary:  Flexbox needs examples with different writing modes
From:     i18nWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0269.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0272.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0273.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0275.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 20. #
Summary:  Baseline determination underdefined
From:     i18nWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0271.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0274.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 21. #
Summary:  Tables as flex items underdefined
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0385.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 22. #
Summary:  Missing 'order' edit to <integer>
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/50096C12.3010908@mozilla.com
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0607.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 23.
Summary:  Accessibility comments on Flexbox
From:     PFWG
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2012JulSep/0049.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0281.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 24.
Summary:  Baseline alignment of inline-flex with overflow
From:     Morten Stenshorne
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0403.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0069.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0096.html
Issue 25.
Summary:  Awkward flex ratio terminology
From:     L. David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0356.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0116.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 26.
Summary:  Clarify parsing of unitless zero in 'flex' shorthand
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0216.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0300.html
Closed:   Accepted