The FCC just voted to kill net neutrality. Congress can still stop it.

CSS Flexible Box Module Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2017-10-19 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-css-flexbox-1-20171019/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Move min-width/min-height: auto definitions to css-sizing
From:     Oriol Brufau
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1920
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1920#issuecomment-342008468
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2103
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2103#issuecomment-360955736
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Dec/0004.html 
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Choose single option for resolving margin/padding percentages
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2085
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2085#issuecomment-362000362
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/db68ee43e752fabf68fd1e776a0ac840f4d3e971
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Feb/0000.html 
Issue 3. #
Summary:  When does min-width/min-height: auto compute to auto vs zero?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2230
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/cf709be33562b27fddd4200824d876378f47fe6d
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Feb/0000.html 
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Make min-width: auto compute to auto always, resolve to zero as needed
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-362114572
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-365688138
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-370625542
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Min-content sizing too smart to be web compatible
From:     Fran├žois Remy
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2353
Open
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Make order do semantic reordering
From:     Robert Utasi
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405#issuecomment-371528202
???:      https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405#issuecomment-371590054
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: previous CSSWG resolutions, Web platform architectural principles, etc.
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Use more formal language in note
From:     Nadya678
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2431
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2431#issuecomment-372120318
Closed:   Accepted
Changes:  (note was removed entirely due to issue 2)