The FCC just voted to kill net neutrality. Congress can still stop it.

CSS Flexible Box Layout Disposition of Comments for 2016-05-26 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-flexbox-1-20160526/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Scrollable oveflow vs alignment
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0107.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0109.html 
Closed:   Accepted
Notes:    Fixed in css-align-3
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ea5c14795ccf05786ab1b1c45e80d7c9d4841bdf
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Add property for switching keyboarding order DOM vs flex order
From:     Léonie Watson
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0119.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0123.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0124.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0125.html 
Closed:   OutOfScope
Notes:    Refiled on css-ui-4 as https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1764
Notes:    See previous discussions on a11y vs layout reordering e.g.
          https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0347.html 
          and
          https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#flow-order
          https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#order-accessibility
Issue 3. #
Summary:  min-height vs border-box sizing
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0163.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0164.html 
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0173.html 
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Add justify-content: space-evenly
From:     Bejamin Strauß
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0034.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0035.html 
Closed:   OutOfScope
Notes:    Already added through CSS Box Alignment module.
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Percentage margins for intrinsic sizing
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0061.html 
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/359 (duped to 347)
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/347
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/347#issuecomment-319662029
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0036.html 
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Definiteness of flex items’ main size depending on flex-basis
From:     Geoffrey Sneddon
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0068.html 
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-324140324
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0026.html 
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-327643730
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-327828487
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Spec lists incorrect initial value for 'flex'
From:     xgq frms
From:     philix
From:     raphaelgoetter
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0030.html 
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/183
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/634
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0034.html 
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/183#issuecomment-227652791
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/634#issuecomment-255542169
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Notes:    =TF= Follow up to OP once update hits /TR
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Flexbox spec currently has "Printer" as its title
From:     dholbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/182
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/182#issuecomment-225712448
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 9. #
Summary:  block-axis baselines
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/197
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/197#issuecomment-248331296
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0076.html 
Issue 10. #
Summary:  More precise definition of baseline-alignment sizing impact
From:     François Remy
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372#issuecomment-237375117
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372#issuecomment-237377783
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Intrinsic Sizing Algo forgets to clamp by min size
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/361
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/361#issuecomment-280448350
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Verified: =biesi= Review.
Issue 12. #
Summary:  'auto' keyword missing from flex-basis
From:     p2227
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329#issuecomment-233586411
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329#event-728412033
Issue 13. #
Summary:  baseline-alignment fallback should be start not flex-start
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/332
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/332#issuecomment-277107165
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: reporter is editor
Issue 14. #
Summary:  Error in axis-mapping table
From:     funorpain
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/205
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/29e6b0adab5cc559202f7fd321c620b17e6046b1
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Absolute ratio flex impossible with margins/padding
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/316
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0036.html 
Veified:  Reporter is editor
Issue 16A. #
Summary:  Baselines of empty boxes and other cases of baseline synthesis
From:     François Remy
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373#issuecomment-242863486
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373#issuecomment-244829198
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0000.html 
Issue 16B. #
Summary:  Baselines of empty boxes
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/439
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/439#issuecomment-246571933
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0028.html 
Issue 17. #
Summary:  Error in example: s/align-content/align-self/
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/436
Closed:   Accepted
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/e377000a95363800f3d945358aee80eea2daade6
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 18. #
Summary:  Static position not following hypothetical position loses use cases
From:     jlukic
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/401
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/401#issuecomment-286486848
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/401#issuecomment-288471456
Closed:   Objection
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0072.html 
Issue 19A. #
Summary:  Computing out align-self auto is problematic
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-244791183
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-244824005
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-247595259
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0041.html 
Issue 19B. #
Summary:  Why changing static position when align-self: auto?
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-268110480
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-280459999
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0001.html 
Issue 19C. #
Summary:  Ambiguous lookup for align-self: auto
From:     Emilio
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-281680347
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-282097463
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 20. #
Summary:  Flex properties applying to table wrapper box
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547#issuecomment-277108563
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547#issuecomment-278414959
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/948
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/948#issuecomment-277320547
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0046.html 
Issue 21. #
Summary:  Errors in update to align-self: auto
From:     Javier Fernandez
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/644
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 22. #
Summary:  Define 'align-content: space-between' for one line in multiline flex
From:     markbrown
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/718
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/718#issuecomment-263037457
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 23. #
Summary:  Typo
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/792
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/792#issuecomment-280439482
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 24. #
Summary:  Missing terminology definitions for flex container axes
From:     Geoffrey Sneddon
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981#issuecomment-280451297
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981#issuecomment-280456508
Issue 25. #
Summary:  Baseline alignment using visual or logical “first” item?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995#issuecomment-281750174
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995#issuecomment-282100035
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0001.html 
Issue 26. #
Summary:  Computed values seem wrong
From:     Javier Fernandez
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1095
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1095#issuecomment-292630500
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 27. #
Summary:  Flex and Grid images size differently
From:     François Remy
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112#issuecomment-321915494
Closed:   Retracted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112#issuecomment-322848926
Issue 28. #
Summary:  Implementations don't match flex container intrinsic main sizes algo
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1147
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1147#issuecomment-290523764
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1147#issuecomment-327625337
Issue 29. #
Summary:  Partial Implementations of align-self values
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1167
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1167#issuecomment-292621161
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/55a77e02361725b3b00347fce599d48eea7136af
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0046.html 
Issue 30. #
Summary:  Missing cross-links
From:     Fuqiao Xue
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1230
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1230#issuecomment-315931608
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 31. #
Summary:  Single line multi-line flex containers don't obey align-content
From:     yisibl
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1268
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1268#issuecomment-296102175
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1268#issuecomment-296143738
Issue 32. #
Summary:  flex-shrink with nested flex containers
From:     François Remy
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1290
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1290#issuecomment-297150175
Closed:   Retracted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1290#event-1067611869
Issue 33. #
Summary:  Stack level of static flex/grid items with z-index
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1312
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1312#issuecomment-298202507
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1312#issuecomment-298202507
Issue 34. #
Summary:  Non-interop with shrinking and growing images
From:     Jen Simmons
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1322
Open
Note:     Being deferred to next editing cycle to allow more in-depth discussion.
Note:     Be sure to file testcases
Issue 35. #
Summary:  Control over spacing between flex items
From:     Keith Grant
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1324
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1324#issuecomment-311176689
Closed:   Deferred to L2
Notes:    See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/592
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 36. #
Summary:  Improve definition linking for max-content contributions
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1419
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1419#issuecomment-315930973
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 37. #
Summary:  Empty flex items contribute 0 even with specified size
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1435
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0026.html 
Issue 38. #
Summary:  'order' should not apply to abspos children of a flexbox
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1439
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1439#issuecomment-315929444
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0351.html 
Issue 39. #
Summary:  ::before/::after as flex items
From:     Cameron McCormack
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1591
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1591#issuecomment-314351468
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 40. #
Summary:  Changes list links to outdated spec prose in other modules
From:     SelenIT
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1595
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1595#issuecomment-314877117
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1595#issuecomment-315925684
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 41. #
Summary:  Confusing wording in accessibility note
From:     Tantek Çelik
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677#issuecomment-319906682
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677#issuecomment-320231369
Issue 42. #
Summary:  Intrinsic sizing with ∑flex < 1 is broken
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-329218845
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-331318337
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-332259616
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-332671797
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0012.html 
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-334855598
Issue 43. #
Summary:  Rename “Implied Minimum Size” section to “Automatic Minimum Size”
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1780
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1780#issuecomment-327593455
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 44. #
Summary:  Confusion over content size vs transferred size of images.
From:     AmeliaBR
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/694
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/694#issuecomment-315920507
Closed:   OutOfScope
Note:     Refiled as https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1609
Issue 45. #
Summary:  Clarify sentence construction in finding max-content flex fraction
From:     Alan Stearns
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1803
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1803#issuecomment-329247658
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 46. #
Summary:  Restore deleted def for auto min size w/o specified size or aspect ratio
From:     Shing Lyu
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/671
Response: https://github.com/shinglyu/csswg-drafts/commit/7d64cfb5c3ad1cabacc3e0d00f72c3717d2a1ef3
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix