The FCC just voted to kill net neutrality. Congress can still stop it.

CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2012-09-18 CR

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-flexbox-20120918/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Handling of zero-length boxes at end of line
From:     Kang-Hao Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Handling of negative-size flex lines
From:     Kang-Hao Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Need way to fill flex-item boxes / Make 'stretch' propagate definiteness
From:     Rudolph Gottesheim
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0204.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0207.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0216.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0217.html
Notes:    Grid (and IE?) reflow after stretching in order to resolve
          percentages inside the item (but treat them as auto for finding
          the flex item's size).
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0464.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html (definite containers)
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0474.html (indefinite containers)
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Constant spacing around items
From:     Giuseppe Bilotta
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0249.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0046.html
Closed:   Deferred (most cases possible; maybe add more spacing controls in next level)
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 5. #
Summary:  If percentage height cannot be resolved, is the flex items stretched?
From:     Ojan Vafai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0220.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0505.html
Notes:    https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15392
          http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html#s.10.5a
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Clarifications to abspos static position in flex containers
From:     Kang-Hao Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0462.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0478.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Conflict in applicability of 'float' to flex items
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0675.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0698.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0691.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0701.html
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Interaction of 'stretch' and items with aspect ratio
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0781.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0040.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Transfer min/max constraints across dimensions via aspect ratio?
From:     Kang-Hao Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0010.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0041.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Do flex items with negative margins increase available space?
From:     Tony Chang
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0460.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0462.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Stretch should clamp cross size to min/max before calculating flex base size
From:     Kang-Hao Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0061.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0157.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolve:  Bugfix
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Orthogonal Flex Layouts Sub-optimally Defined
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0251.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0260.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified:
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Should ::first-line/::first-letter apply to a flex container?
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0264.html
Response:
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 14. #
Summary:  Clarify interaction of min-width and width
From:     Ojan Vafai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0046.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0050.html
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Should 'overflow' apply to flex containers?
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0465.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0001.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 16. #
Summary:  What should percentage margins on a flex item be relative to?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0143.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0688.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0688.html
Issue 17. #
Summary:  Revert min-size of flex items to 0.
From:     Tab Atkins Jr.
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0364.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0257.html
Closed:   Accepted
See also: Issue 19
Issue 18. #
Summary:  Paint flex items and table cells atomically
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0707.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0133.html
Closed:   Accepted
Note:     Recommends corresponding CSS2.1 change for Table layout, see
          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0145.html
          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0027.html
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0133.html
Issue 19. #
Summary:  Re-revert min-size of flex items back to 'auto', with overflow consideration
From:     Elliot Sprehn
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0538.html
Analysis: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0456.html
See also: Issue 17
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0463.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 20. #
Summary:  Min/max constraint sizing of flexible flex-basis: 0.
From:     Tab Aktins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0342.html
Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0511.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0463.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 21. #
Summary:  Clarify interaction of table fixup and flex itemizing
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0508.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0462.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 22. #
Summary:  Re-evaluate static position of flex items and grid items
From:     Daniel Holbert and fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0514.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0459.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0217.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0255.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0146.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0468.html
Issue 23. #
Summary:  Intrinsic cross-sizing vs. main-size
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0360.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0171.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion, needs LC review for correctness
Issue 24. #
Summary:  Missing clamp to min/max size
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0698.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0701.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 25. #
Summary:  change initial value of align-items to flex-start
From:     Bruno Racineaux
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0117.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0142.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0152.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0166.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0474.html
Issue 26. #
Summary:  Clarify "white space"
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0369.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0555.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0556.html
Resolved: Clarification
Issue 27. #
Summary:  Remove example's dependency on CSS3 Box Alignment
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0032.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0145.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 28. #
Summary:  Handling <br> as text
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0317.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0425.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0055.html
Issue 29. #
Summary:  Distinguish element vs. box
From:     Peter Moulder
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0459.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0423.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 30. #
Summary:  Discontinuity of flex values between 0 and 1
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0246.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0424.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0055.html
Issue 31. #
Summary:  Confusion wrt computed 'display' and box generation
From:     Peter Moulder
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0469.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0173.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 32. #
Summary:  Should 'float' compute to 'none' on flex items
From:     Peter Moulder
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0469.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0173.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0474.html
Issue 33. #
Summary:  Does 'order' affect counters
From:     Peter Moulder
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0469.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0176.html
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0474.html