CSS Display Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2015-10-15 WD

Dated Draft: hhttps://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-display-3-20151015/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  table-caption & table-cell should use flow-root not flow
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0372.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0064.html 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Define <br> and <wbr>
From:     Ian Hickson, Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0155.html 
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610#issuecomment-274911199
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0065.html 
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0066.html 
Closed:   Deferred to HTML https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2291
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Shouldn't root be in-flow?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0332.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Interaction of run-in and ::first-letter
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0330.html 
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650#issuecomment-274908554
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Inconsistent implementation of 'display: flex' on <fieldset>
From:     glanbin
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321#issuecomment-232788709
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Consider removing 'display: run-in'
From:     Ms2ger
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339#issuecomment-234783783
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
-
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Define interaction of 'display: contents' and replaced elements
From:     Simon Pieters
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540#issuecomment-285214950
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sQbKYcM6mmRueGJBozPGer_UwQDMyv+eww3kOBAHC7mg@mail.gmail.com 
-
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Display value visible to AT
From:     Dave Cramer, Sara Soueidan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560#issuecomment-270094051
Closed:   OutOfScope
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Effect of 'display: contents' on counter scoping
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/674
Response:
Closed:   Accepted
Note:     Still needs edits in css-lists-3.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Why is introduction normative? Also defining “element”?
From:     Anne van Kesteren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680#issuecomment-270103941
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 12. #
Summary:  'display: contents' on root element
From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805#issuecomment-266991346
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 13. #
Summary:  “run-in box with 'display: flow'” nonsensical
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832#issuecomment-270106512
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 14. #
Summary:  "flow-root" harmful
From:     Binyammin Laukstein
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275141140
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275208753
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Rename flow-root
From:     Simon Fraser
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964#issuecomment-274638719
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com 
Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com 
Issue 16. #
Summary:  Tooltips are wrong
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834#issuecomment-280431244
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 17. #
Summary:  HTML shouldn't be a normative reference
From:     Bert Bos
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011#issuecomment-286501361
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 18. #
Summary:  What are form controls?
From:     Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024#issuecomment-285215276
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 19. #
Summary:  Anonymous boxes inheriting from `display: contents`
From:     Oriol, Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1249
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301942276
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html 
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301953751
Issue 20. #
Summary:  Propagation of text-decoration applied to `display: contents`
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136#issuecomment-301938274
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9a8bdda32c4d22a2cbc98d6c3724b72f651b6b3
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html 
Issue 21. #
Summary:  `display: block` seems to define flex and grid items as block-level
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292656095
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292738919
Response:
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 22. #
Summary:  Display erroneously groups ruby with atomic inlines
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180#issuecomment-292638199
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 23. #
Summary:  Block containers can also establish an inline formatting context
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301622704
Cloed:    Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301630234
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-314583112
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 24. #
Summary:  Revisions to *-level definitions
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294637052
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294646968
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-301623329
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 25. #
Summary:  Do table captions participate in BFC or TFC?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189#issuecomment-301626461
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 26. #
Summary:  Table contins invalid values
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225#issuecomment-301631015
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 27. #
Summary:  list-item definition implies invalid keyword combos are valid
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226#issuecomment-301631288
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 28. #
Summary:  Do contents and none have outer display type?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227#issuecomment-301631748
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 29. #
Summary:  Run-in erroneously excludes blocks that establish inline formatting context
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228#issuecomment-301632605
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2f6354014360662e2aef0e25da433852d4fa8b3a
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 30. #
Summary:  Blockification rules not backwards-compatible for inline-block
From:     Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-301634850
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-305246779
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-313211986
Open:     =WG= Discuss.
Issue 31. #
Summary:  Rename “block container” to “flow container”
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301635795
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301639507
Issue 32. #
Summary:  Text nodes vs text runs
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281#issuecomment-301942809
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html 
Issue 33. #
Summary:  Inheritance with 'display: contents' and ::first-line
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310
Response:
Open
Issue 34. #
Summary:  Define 'display: contents' as a type of box
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299120942
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299247618
Closed:   Retracted
Issue 35. #
Summary:  Define more sensible blockification for layout-internal types
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340#issuecomment-301641681
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5aaca4a7030e818cd02ac2d93137e1cd1d295bae
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 36. #
Summary:  Inlinification, recursion, and ruby vs display definitions
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301643296
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301944521
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-313204672
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html 
Issue 37. #
Summary:  Does display: contents apply to ::before ::after
From:     Emilio
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345#issuecomment-313205067
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html 
Issue 38. #
Summary:  Define interaction of various box tree fixups
From:     Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301878155
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301888405
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302250667
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302748058
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f5b79e99bb8fc9ebea4ed956ed3420bc69b90786
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 39. #
Summary:  Root inline box vs anonymous inline boxes
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301832460
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301833956
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301872204
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6aeeabe060c8d8c1397ef2196a4e3a62da964d5e
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 40. #
Summary:  Inlinification by display type or anon box fixup?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390#issuecomment-313211238
Closed:   Retracted
Issue 41. #
Summary:  Computation of 'float' vs 'position' without a box
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436#issuecomment-313215820
Open
Issue 42. #
Summary:  Are run-in contents inside ::first-line?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313246128
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313249402
Issue 43. #
Summary:  “Becoming a formatting context” section is a mess
From:     Oriol, fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-313225448
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563
Open
Issue 44. #
Summary:  Is 'position: marker' out-of-flow?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458#issuecomment-313224602
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 45. #
Summary:  Does run-in algo recurse?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460#issuecomment-314593762
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c9f1bb16d0e5077b9bca7027a7d7252eeff5abf1
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 46. #
Summary:  Parallel construction should be pairwise disjoint (editorial)
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1470
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09212af80e10e4e3e57965bb27b2de3fdcd86e06
Closed:   Fixed
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 47. #
Summary:  BFC definition not quite right
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313240736
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313247457
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313263022
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313252408
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313266528
Open
Issue 48. #
Summary:  Run-in fixup vs block-in-inline fixup
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472#issuecomment-313242917
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 49. #
Summary:  Note wrt inheritance of ::first-line through 'display: contents'.
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473#issuecomment-313247421
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 50. #
Summary:  Display types: on elements or on boxes?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314569164
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314583675
Issue 51. #
Summary:  Should 'inline-foo' and 'inline foo' be distinct?
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486
Open
Issue 52. #
Summary:  At-risk list omits three-component values
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1490
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/394c62f72fda4ac824c9ce204a99bf991b9e6471
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 53. #
Summary:  Discrepencies in run-in
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491#issuecomment-314570280
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 54. #
Summary:  Serialization of list-item values not listed
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493#issuecomment-314572350
Closed:   OutOfScope (to CSSOM) / Rejected (for editorial)
Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial
Issue 55. #
Summary:  Missing definition of 'inline-list-item'
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495#issuecomment-306282449
Open
Issue 56. #
Summary:  Redesign 'flow-root' keyword and related features
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496
Open
Issue 57. #
Summary:  Inlinification doesn't inlinify layout-internal boxes
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582
Response:
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 58. #
Summary:  <legend> with no box example is confusing
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494427
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494885
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313498359
Open
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 59. #
Summary:  Blocks that contain only inlines, establishing BFC+IFC?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553
Open
Issue 60. #
Summary:  Define establishing a BFC as a flow-root only thing via used values
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550
Open