CSS Display Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2015-10-15 WD

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-display-3-20151015/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  table-caption & table-cell should use flow-root not flow
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0372.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0064.html 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Define <br> and <wbr>
From:     Ian Hickson, Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0155.html 
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610#issuecomment-274911199
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0065.html 
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0066.html 
Closed:   Deferred to HTML https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2291
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Shouldn't root be in-flow?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0332.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Interaction of run-in and ::first-letter
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0330.html 
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650#issuecomment-274908554
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Inconsistent implementation of 'display: flex' on <fieldset>
From:     glanbin
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321#issuecomment-232788709
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Consider removing 'display: run-in'
From:     Ms2ger
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339#issuecomment-234783783
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
-
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Define interaction of 'display: contents' and replaced elements
From:     Simon Pieters
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540#issuecomment-285214950
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sQbKYcM6mmRueGJBozPGer_UwQDMyv+eww3kOBAHC7mg@mail.gmail.com 
-
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Display value visible to AT
From:     Dave Cramer, Sara Soueidan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560#issuecomment-270094051
Closed:   OutOfScope
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Effect of 'display: contents' on counter scoping
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/674
Response:
Closed:   Accepted
Note:     Still needs edits in css-lists-3.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html 
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Why is introduction normative? Also defining “element”?
From:     Anne van Kesteren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680#issuecomment-270103941
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 12. #
Summary:  'display: contents' on root element
From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805#issuecomment-266991346
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 13. #
Summary:  “run-in box with 'display: flow'” nonsensical
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832#issuecomment-270106512
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 14. #
Summary:  "flow-root" harmful
From:     Binyammin Laukstein
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275141140
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275208753
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Rename flow-root
From:     Simon Fraser
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964#issuecomment-274638719
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com 
Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com 
Issue 16. #
Summary:  Tooltips are wrong
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834#issuecomment-280431244
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 17. #
Summary:  HTML shouldn't be a normative reference
From:     Bert Bos
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011#issuecomment-286501361
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 18. #
Summary:  What are form controls?
From:     Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024#issuecomment-285215276
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 19. #
Summary:  Anonymous boxes inheriting from `display: contents`
From:     Oriol, Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1249
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301942276
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html 
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301953751
Issue 20. #
Summary:  Propagation of text-decoration applied to `display: contents`
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136#issuecomment-301938274
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9a8bdda32c4d22a2cbc98d6c3724b72f651b6b3
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html 
Issue 21. #
Summary:  `display: block` seems to define flex and grid items as block-level
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292656095
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292738919
Response:
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 22. #
Summary:  Display erroneously groups ruby with atomic inlines
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180#issuecomment-292638199
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 23. #
Summary:  Block containers can also establish an inline formatting context
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301622704
Cloed:    Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301630234
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-314583112
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 24. #
Summary:  Revisions to *-level definitions
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294637052
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294646968
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-301623329
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 25. #
Summary:  Do table captions participate in BFC or TFC?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189#issuecomment-301626461
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 26. #
Summary:  Table contins invalid values
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225#issuecomment-301631015
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 27. #
Summary:  list-item definition implies invalid keyword combos are valid
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226#issuecomment-301631288
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 28. #
Summary:  Do contents and none have outer display type?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227#issuecomment-301631748
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 29. #
Summary:  Run-in erroneously excludes blocks that establish inline formatting context
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228#issuecomment-301632605
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2f6354014360662e2aef0e25da433852d4fa8b3a
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 30. #
Summary:  Blockification rules not backwards-compatible for inline-block
From:     Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-301634850
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-305246779
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-313211986
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0042.html 
Issue 31. #
Summary:  Rename “block container” to “flow container”
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301635795
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301639507
Issue 32. #
Summary:  Text nodes vs text runs
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281#issuecomment-301942809
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html 
Issue 33. #
Summary:  Inheritance with 'display: contents' and ::first-line
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310#issuecomment-301641199
Closed:   OutOfScope
Notes:    Deferred to css-pseudo-4, as ::first-line in general needs tighter definition
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html 
Issue 34. #
Summary:  Define 'display: contents' as a type of box
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299120942
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299247618
Closed:   Retracted
Issue 35. #
Summary:  Define more sensible blockification for layout-internal types
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340#issuecomment-301641681
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5aaca4a7030e818cd02ac2d93137e1cd1d295bae
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 36. #
Summary:  Inlinification, recursion, and ruby vs display definitions
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301643296
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301944521
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-313204672
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html 
Issue 37. #
Summary:  Does display: contents apply to ::before ::after
From:     Emilio
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345#issuecomment-313205067
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html 
Issue 38. #
Summary:  Define interaction of various box tree fixups
From:     Boris Zbarsky
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301878155
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301888405
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302250667
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302748058
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f5b79e99bb8fc9ebea4ed956ed3420bc69b90786
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 39. #
Summary:  Root inline box vs anonymous inline boxes
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301832460
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301833956
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301872204
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6aeeabe060c8d8c1397ef2196a4e3a62da964d5e
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 40. #
Summary:  Inlinification by display type or anon box fixup?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390#issuecomment-313211238
Closed:   Retracted
Issue 41. #
Summary:  Computation of 'float' vs 'position' without a box
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436#issuecomment-313215820
Closed:   OutOfScope
Notes:    Accepted, pending edits to css-2 and css-position-3
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html 
Issue 42. #
Summary:  Are run-in contents inside ::first-line?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313246128
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313249402
Issue 43. #
Summary:  “Becoming a formatting context” section is a mess
From:     Oriol, fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-313225448
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563#issuecomment-314573128
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/94982e838a558e6c66516b3b13e403eae32e27ad
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0030.html 
Issue 44. #
Summary:  Is 'position: marker' out-of-flow?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458#issuecomment-313224602
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 45. #
Summary:  Does run-in algo recurse?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460#issuecomment-314593762
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c9f1bb16d0e5077b9bca7027a7d7252eeff5abf1
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 46. #
Summary:  Parallel construction should be pairwise disjoint (editorial)
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1470
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09212af80e10e4e3e57965bb27b2de3fdcd86e06
Closed:   Fixed
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 47. #
Summary:  BFC definition not quite right
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313240736
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313247457
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313263022
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313252408
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313266528
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 48. #
Summary:  Run-in fixup vs block-in-inline fixup
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472#issuecomment-313242917
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 49. #
Summary:  Note wrt inheritance of ::first-line through 'display: contents'.
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473#issuecomment-313247421
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 50. #
Summary:  Display types: on elements or on boxes?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314569164
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314583675
Issue 51. #
Summary:  Should 'inline-foo' and 'inline foo' be distinct?
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486#issuecomment-320022628
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 52. #
Summary:  At-risk list omits three-component values
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1490
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/394c62f72fda4ac824c9ce204a99bf991b9e6471
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 53. #
Summary:  Discrepencies in run-in
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491#issuecomment-314570280
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 54. #
Summary:  Serialization of list-item values not listed
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493#issuecomment-314572350
Closed:   OutOfScope (to CSSOM) / Rejected (for editorial)
Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial
Issue 55. #
Summary:  Missing definition of 'inline-list-item'
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495#issuecomment-306282449
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html 
Issue 56. #
Summary:  Redesign 'flow-root' keyword and related features
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496#issuecomment-319986260
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496#issuecomment-320027059
Issue 57. #
Summary:  Inlinification doesn't inlinify layout-internal boxes
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582#issuecomment-314605575
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 58. #
Summary:  <legend> with no box example is confusing
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494427
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494885
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313498359
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-391181313
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/beb5964179f6fc815e59e23a1de501cddab7355a
Closed:   Accepted
Notes:    See also https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/3702
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 59. #
Summary:  Blocks that contain only inlines, establishing BFC+IFC?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553#issuecomment-375120025
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/8bb4d824180eccee53864aa40b883d0eb7140c0a
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 60. #
Summary:  Define establishing a BFC as a flow-root only thing via used values
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-387160020
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0258e7ac526cffce6e81d13110ba79a681504fff
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/72141508e866058bd9a431abdb97c3406d9e34b2
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html 
Issue 61. #
Summary:  Is the principal box unique?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1604
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1604#issuecomment-374366647
Closed:   OutOfScope
Notes:    Follow-up for css-flow-3 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1477
Issue 62. #
Summary:  run-in fixup should create inline-block when parent inlinifies
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1607
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1607#issuecomment-374368323
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 63. #
Summary:  Define how block containers establish an inline formatting context
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374369526
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374376423
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374385637
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-398958073
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 64. #
Summary:  Position of 'list-item' when serializing 'display'
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1621
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1621#issuecomment-374730492
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 65. #
Summary:  Clarify that outer display type only affects principal box
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1622
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c5d8900d4cc8dedd4f7a02d506d0e0cd2cb5a639
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 66. #
Summary:  Compact at-risk list
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1623
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/9f72f245cba50a173813c36b771f552fe8104964
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 67. #
Summary:  list-item generates ::marker pseudo-element (not necessarily box)
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1625
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ed5c6a31724e014f3336dbf7901c5ef5cb1eaf20
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 68. #
Summary:  Mismatched references (to CSS2 vs css-lists-3)
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1626
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1626#issuecomment-374373751
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/7af6650e9ad441bac22fe833cb413112262f9149
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 69. #
Summary:  Mention that block ruby generates principal block box
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1629
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5e90348a26aecbed6d878cce89cbbc7db1b058ff
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 70. #
Summary:  run-in insertion point vs ::marker with 'display'
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1638
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1638#issuecomment-316979494
Closed:   Retracted
Issue 71. #
Summary:  Are run-in sequences merged during reparenting?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1639
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ef3c8fd8b2fe85c32a2dc393ca3b2810a414ea88
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 72. #
Summary:  Clarify run-in recursion vs anonymous-block wrapping
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374384660
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c7841af7ab963a5e91b2436ffe60ece80700cc7e
Closed:   Accepted
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374390920
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-398963365
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 73. #
Summary:  Define inner display type of replaced elements
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-374399290
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 74. #
Summary:  How does inner display type compute on replaced elements if out of scope?
From:     Sebastien Zartner
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-317237475
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-398964350
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 75. #
Summary:  Define style computation reflection between boxes and elements
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-350398313
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1702
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1702#issuecomment-374415941
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/b2d484c6ab9c4dbdb8fdca899e2d37d59d6953e3
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html 
Issue 76. #
Summary:  Define some box construction guidance for specs
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-350398313
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/533ac0a31b0262c4a0d09c77e19604666fe35e14
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html 
Issue 77. #
Summary:  table grid box is not a defined term
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-376733708
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-378768000
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/193022f623acd1b95a1fddae76fd98408a618d8b
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 78. #
Summary:  Rename table box to table grid box (in CSS2 & CSS Tables L3)
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2501
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2501#issuecomment-380792875
Open:     Changing back is pending edits to CSS2 and css-tables-3
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0044.html 
Issue 79. #
Summary:  Boxes shouldn't have display types, should only have levels/FC-types
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-374423595
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-407597682
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 80. #
Summary:  Explicitly exclude non-zero sequences of run-ins from processing
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398970537
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398982401
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 81. #
Summary:  Link to definition of white space
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1664
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ada381e196c8ed510977cb55916ee5fb96447b25
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 82. #
Summary:  s/text/text run/ now that text run is defined
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1667
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c3a695c65170e1667090d87310b87df79d93d398
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 83. #
Summary:  What if containing block is not ICB and not generated from a box?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-319916887
Closed:   Invalid
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-350404179
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-374790036
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 84. #
Summary:  Make inlinified 'block ruby' an inline-block instead of inline
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700#issuecomment-374415499
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 85. #
Summary:  'block' only generates block-level boxes in flow layout
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1704
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1704#issuecomment-374418771
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4358d72a927b265d9b7482a57277dc635c076b76
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 86. #
Summary:  Clarify blockification of 'run-in flow-root'
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1715
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1715#issuecomment-374420463
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html 
Issue 87. #
Summary:  'display' computed value wrong in propdef table
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1716
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1716
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 89. #
Summary:  Do empty text nodes generate text runs?
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1808
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1808#issuecomment-329345715
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4c21a2aa923a757c577bf4a4e33a6291a78c8690
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 90. #
Summary:  Clarify element tree definition
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1810
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1810#issuecomment-375137826
Closed:   OutOfScope
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html 
Issue 91. #
Summary:  SVG 'display: contents' interaction incompletely defined
From:     Rune Lillesveen
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2118
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2118#issuecomment-374802030
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2cdf747bbbfe0c58a87455beca9c35b72555b09a
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 92. #
Summary:  Define interaction of 'display: contents' and MathML
From:     Emilio Álvarez
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167#issuecomment-375119086
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1d3e6a04c847df82fa3c4023e23f4ea55dcab169
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167#issuecomment-375792285
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html 
Issue 93. #
Summary:  Does 'display' affect screen reader semantics?
From:     Ilya Streltsyn
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-368287740
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-375084853
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378670370
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378778909
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 94. #
Summary:  Does 'display: contents' affect anchor targeting?
From:     Ilya Streltsyn
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378842501
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378992876
Changes:  https://github.com/fergald/csswg-drafts/commit/2343af6382b55e8ce5caf9c0ee40d68ef032b421
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 95. #
Summary:  Effect of 'display: contents' on SVG layout attributes
From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-378809174
Closed:   Accepted
Veified:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-399498551
Issue 96. #
Summary:  Integrate definition of Shadow Trees
From:     Anne van Kesteren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2365
Closed:   OutOfScope
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html 
Issue 97. #
Summary:  Blockification should establish a new formatting context
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2598
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2598#issuecomment-387157017
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 98. #
Summary:  Swap where default inner/outer display types are defined
From:     Oriol
Commment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658#issuecomment-391175246
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658#issuecomment-393271657
Resolved: Editorial
---
Issue 99.
Summary:  Blockification of blocks should establish new FC
From:     Oriol
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673#issuecomment-389935782
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html 
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html 
Issue 100. #
Summary:  Compute 'display: contents' on elided elements to 'none'
From:     Emlio Álvarez
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2755
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f13b84237c6a17823ebdd55919d15d3bac83275b
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jun/0032.html 
Issue 101. #
Summary:  Revisit equivalency of `inline-block` and `inline flow-root`
From:     Oriol Brufau
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2947
Closed:   Rejected
Notes:    See also earlier issues / discussion.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html 
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html