CSS Display Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2020-05-19 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-css-display-3-20200519/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Ruby vs “formatting context”
From:     Myles Maxfield
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5047
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5047#issuecomment-626093104
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5047#issuecomment-769634665
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/76b18974bf52eb446219b4a1b09566cd06c95400
Closed:   Accepted / OutOfScope
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5047#event-4267935267
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 2. #
Summary:  typo
From:     beantaxi
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5078
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5078#issuecomment-633441736
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Confusion over “formatting context”
From:     vwkd
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5105
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5105#issuecomment-893876965
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Duplicate export of “inline formatting context”
From:     Anne van Kesteren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5209
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5209#issuecomment-643904973
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1f2c366ef4372bdda8b2ff44ef5db893d608c785
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Adding display:math|inline-math
From:     Brian Kardell
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385#issuecomment-690462275
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385#issuecomment-694369213
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385#issuecomment-745563829
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385#issuecomment-819641982
Closed:   OutOfScope (refiled against MathML Core)
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2020Sep/0007.html 
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/2020/09/17-css-minutes#item04
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Apr/0002.html 
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Should <display-legacy> values be aliased at parse time?
From:     Oriol Brufau
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5575
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5575#issuecomment-893899115
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/48ba2b32840196e1a869f9992c3db6a82f0c2d39
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Aug/0017.html 
Issue 7. #
Summary:  order property only mentions “flex items”
From:     Julian Descottes
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865#issuecomment-884323316
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865#issuecomment-884524335
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865#issuecomment-885235341
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0259f1f7df9fc4649501c3a4735261418e667a3a
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Jul/0011.html 
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Replaced ruby annotation containers and base containers nonsensical
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6000
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6000#issuecomment-826081277
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6000#issuecomment-826461265
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2297b7b60a7bf76bf1a2b40ac9a0012fa210b7be
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6000#issuecomment-826461265 (thumbs up)
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Apr/0006.html 
Issue 9. #
Summary:  visibility:visible inside visibility:hidden a11y problems
From:     JAWS-test
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6123
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6123#issuecomment-897938789
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6123#issuecomment-893890561 (thumbs up)
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Aug/0004.html 
Issue 10. #
Summary:  subgrids don't establish a new grid formatting context
From:     Oriol Brufau
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6157
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6157#issuecomment-810464691
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c14215da0e673b0f47faea2e9d37c965058c6f83
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Make explicit that inlinification/blockification affects computed value
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6251
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/086abc058d3a3f6f7f6730d2af827bd555a58279
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Why is 'display' not animatable?
From:     Lea Verou
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429#issuecomment-875717214
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429#issuecomment-877890546
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429#issuecomment-875730258
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Remove redundant 'flow' keyword
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3998
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3998#issuecomment-498667303
Closed:   Rejected
Note:     Commenter is Mozilla implementer, and Mozilla is shipping the keyword.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Aug/0017.html 
Issue 14. #
Summary:  Add 'display: contents list-item'?
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4022
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4022#issuecomment-893887886
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Aug/0017.html