The FCC just voted to kill net neutrality. Congress can still stop it.

CSS Counter Styles Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-07-18 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-counter-styles-3-20130718/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Hebrew should re-use the 1-100 digits for 1k-100k, separated by geresh.
From:     Matitiahu Allouche
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0378.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0393.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Korean styles should have a negative indicator
From:     MURAKAMI Shinyu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0229.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0705.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Spec says all Longhand CJK are negative-capable, but Korean isn't.
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/5213B4A4.5090706@w3.org
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0706.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Spec's description of longhand CJK styles is slightly clumsy.
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0376.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0707.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 5. #
Summary:  ethiopic-numeric step 5 is wrong.
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0375.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0714.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 6. #
Summary:  CJK examples for 10, 11, 100, and 101 were wrong for some languages.
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0374.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0737.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Treatment of cycles in 'speak-as' are undefined.
From:     Reece Dunn
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0716.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0735.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Suffix for Korean styles should be an ASCII comma, not ideographic comma.
From:     신정식 (Jungshik SHIN)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0292.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0742.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Fix location of Predefined Counter Styles document
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0747.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0007.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Step 5 in the CJK algorithm isn't needed.
From:     MURAKAMI Shinyu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0228.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0283.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0009.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0011.html
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Suggested changes to Chinese and Korean informal styles
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0101.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0102.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0605.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0207.html
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Behavior of setting CSSOM @counter-style attributes to invalid values is undefined
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0276.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0707.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Missing 'speak-as' descriptor from CSSOM API for @counter-style
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0197.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0201.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 14. #
Summary:  What should the OM for @counter-style return for unspecified descriptors?
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0324.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0532.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Loops in the 'system:override' aren't specified.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0523.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0638.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 16. #
Summary:  'pad' should only apply to some styles
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0520.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0531.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0207.html
Issue 17. #
Summary:  'speak-as:auto' isn't handled correctly when 'system:override'.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0628.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0636.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 18. #
Summary:  Definitions of 'hiragana', 'katakana', and their -iroha variants doesn't match implementations.
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0494.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0495.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0641.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 19. #
Summary:  'pad' should count characters, not symbols.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0549.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0550.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0643.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 20. #
Summary:  upper/lower-roman styles should max out at 3999
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0661.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0690.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 21. #
Summary:  speak-as loops should only "fix" styles actually participating in the loop
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0672.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0693.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 22. #
Summary:  'symbolic' algorithm is wrong
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0664.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0695.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 23. #
Summary:  Spec is unclear about whether redefining the builtins affects built-in fallbacks.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0653.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0689.html
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 24. #
Summary:  Referring to 'character' for length limits is ambiguous.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0651.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0701.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 25. #
Summary:  'alphabetic' and 'symbolic' systems should generate no repr for 0, rather than doing fallback
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0663.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0697.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0698.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0703.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0710.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0207.html
Issue 26. #
Summary:  'cjk-decimal' style shouldn't be defined for negatives, as there's no common negative sign.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0001.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0026.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0031.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 27. #
Summary:  It's not defined what to do if an unknown counter-style name is used in counter()/etc
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0178.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0179.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0200.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0201.html
Issue 28. #
Summary:  Impls should be allowed to go past the complex CJK limits
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0139.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0204.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 29. #
Summary:  Spec should mention the minimum # of symbols requirement for symbols() function.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0121.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0128.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 30. #
Summary:  CSSCounterStyleRule#name setter should lowercase the built-in names.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0011.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0130.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 31. #
Summary:  symbols() values need to specify their 'pad' and 'speak-as' values.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0131.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0133.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 32. #
Summary:  The term 'negative-capable' is confusing.
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0053.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0184.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 33. #
Summary:  "speak-as: auto" does the wrong thing for override systems.
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0054.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0055.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0185.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 34. #
Summary:  'negative' and 'pad' interactions are contradictory
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0400.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0193.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0060.html
Issue 35. #
Summary:  English vs CJK spacing between marker and list item content
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0434.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0210.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0060.html
Issue 36. #
Summary:  Allow reading out counter values as words (alt text)
From:     James Craig
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0146.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0209.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0060.html
Issue 37. #
Summary:  Behavior of "range:auto" when extending a complex predefined style is undefined
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0186.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0187.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 38. #
Summary:  Handle i18n of spoken counter styles better
From:     James Craig
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0267.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0335.html
Closed:   Deferred
Issue 39. #
Summary:  Name of 'override' system is confusing
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0594.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0004.html
Closed:   Accepted