CSS Counter Styles Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2015-06-11 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-css-counter-styles-3-20150611/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-counter-styles-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Minor Comments
From:     timeless
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0054.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0009.html 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Armenian Typo
From:     Yifán Wáng
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0247.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0052.html 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Typo in "Accumulating Numerals"
From:     Martin Janecke
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0086.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0008.html 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 4. #
Summary:  “in the document language” imprecise
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0258.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0055.html 
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1845
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1845#issuecomment-340053939
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0034.html 
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Error in trad-chinese-formal description
From:     Momdo Nakamura
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0088.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0112.html 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Require --prefix for counter styles?
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0267.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0277.html 
Closed:   Retracted
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Compute missing counter styles to 'decimal'
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0076.html 
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0082.html 
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1616
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0034.html 
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Why remove upper-greek?
From:     Athanasios Viennas
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0220.html 
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/135
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Previous CSSWG Resolution
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Additive tuples of the same declaration with the same weight undefined
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220#issuecomment-315933860
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220#issuecomment-315933860
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Invalid values make rule invalid instead of declaration
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220#issuecomment-315933860
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220#issuecomment-315933860
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Are none/decimal/system/fallback invalid in @counter-style or excluded from <counter-style-name>?
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1285
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1285#issuecomment-296700102
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1285#issuecomment-296965383
Response:
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Exclude 'none' from <counter-style-name>
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1295
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1295#issuecomment-298109476
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0023.html 
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Do not use CSS parser for CSSCounterStyleRule::name
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1325
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1325#issuecomment-300029288
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion (based on precedent / consistency)
Issue 14. #
Summary:  Make 'disc' not overridable
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1521
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1521#issuecomment-309565094
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0039.html 
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Invalid @counter-style should still exist in CSSOM
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1682
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1682#issuecomment-320540196
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1682#issuecomment-335868951
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0025.html 
Issue 16. #
Summary:  Mark <image> in <symbol> at risk
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1991
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1991#issuecomment-349822315
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Dec/0011.html 
Issue 17. #
Summary:  Change cjk-eartly-branch and cjk-heavenly-stem to fixed
From:     c933103
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2096
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2096#issuecomment-563495201
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion