CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2017-02-21 WD

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-contain-1-20170221/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  layout containment should make an element containing block for absolute/fixed positioned elements
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issue-170956476
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issuecomment-295148939
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issuecomment-295148939
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Unclear what contain:size does for replaced elements
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issue-169478944
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issuecomment-295148501
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issuecomment-295148501<Paste>
Issue 3. #
Summary:  We may want size containement in 1d
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issue-207386839
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issuecomment-295152488
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issuecomment-295152488
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Make It easier to use contain: size in cases where the size is unknown
From:     bmaurer
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issue-208209686
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-281277097
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-295157661
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Use proper HTML in markup example
From:     Thierry Koblentz
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issue-209813058
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issuecomment-282089800
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issuecomment-282330942
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Clarify ambiguous phrasing
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/830#issue-197360152
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Reuse "ink overflow" terminology
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/396#issue-170423394
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Layout containment and overflow
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0314.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3vDKAKWCeUgPGC_T2BCSBCq1byCOJfzVfX8i+BbYqOC1Q@mail.gmail.com
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Splitting the "sizing" part from "layout" containment
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDBe5Qq7Xb3Cxi6ee4y4b6FxbwYM_mxinvhjpkdWKFAiqw@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCa-LHxVFGACoGav19wWztQg_GRDmS8fEf=EJaF_B0now@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/AEA060EC-7235-4C90-97BE-CBC317229714@rivoal.net
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0384.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Remove dependency of paint containment on overflow clip
From:     leviw
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sME1oBdWnJ-kQikH0jGLC6xYamWr3qvsa6FurQLLeb_A@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sME1oBdWnJ-kQikH0jGLC6xYamWr3qvsa6FurQLLeb_A@mail.gmail.com
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Overflow when layout containment is on should be ink overflow
From:     Florian Rvoal
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/86302BF1-1488-4E69-8529-3332B5A0BB9A@rivoal.net
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3t4RuTWnQr_dDtd18zQEBYRzfi0P35R_HACZGyPmbwVTA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/02e25a3f48bd0cd1be349513a024d71891d64de0
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 12. #
Summary:  The 'contain' property doesn't work well with regions
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/EF27E698-1B0A-47DB-ACF1-DACE59126A03@rivoal.net
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/D1B9B001.29FD3%25stearns@adobe.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/2A0F0B36-6765-475D-85D9-0AE7DDE6EB94@rivoal.net
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDA+4yz2952hHaf576B6rZdanJsYOQVn5Cg6zgZtd9REdw@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Clarify interation with display content
From:     Kyle Zentner
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CA+h3cCpKxWD=nXedcoFUffg=7+Lk0U=PjH4uVpxdNOePYiwjRg@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/31FDCD6A-7CAE-4984-9FE4-C3D580CAB49B@rivoal.net
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-04-19/#e798577
Issue 14. #
Summary:  Clarify interation with table parts
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/55BA836C.6060404@mozilla.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/B10ABC55-830F-46E7-88E5-5659F4E5E926@rivoal.net
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCxm8F+rQaUzQa47F-H=6W_peyTsZctOYV9a4ZHRUj4hA@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDBQ7XCcO69pMn7V6F8DasjMfMWEuof2UTTXOJo9Uf0aZA@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/A904B03A-4B63-480F-842E-F4290CD1AACE@rivoal.net
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-04-21/#e800809