CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2020-12-22 REC

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/REC-css-contain-1-20201222

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/

None

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Accepted or Rejected and positive response
Rejected and no response
Rejected and negative response
Deferred
Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  contain:size shouldn't fragment as monolithic
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5648
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5648#issuecomment-715036609
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5648#issuecomment-1240034875

Issue 2. #
Summary:  Minor editorial tweaks and grammar corrections
From:     Chris Lilley
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5806
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial

Issue 3. #
Summary:  Should css-contain-1 allow new features post publication as REC?
From:     Chris Lilley
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5806
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5808#issuecomment-748575361
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5808#event-4134236457

Issue 4. #
Summary:  :root/body viewport propagation and containment
From:     Rune Lillesveen
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5913
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5913#issuecomment-844290779 (tracked in spec as Candidate Correction 3)
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5808#event-4134236457

Issue 5. #
Summary:  should it be possible for an element with contain:paint to be part of a transform-style:preserve-3d scene?
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6202
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6202#issuecomment-857863089 (resulted in change to other spec)

Issue 6. #
Summary:  paint containment vs filter effects
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6325
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6325#issuecomment-866993550 (editorial)

Issue 7. #
Summary:  Are intrinsic sizing keywords definite with size containment?
From:     Oriol Brufau
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7206
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7206#issuecomment-1218266195 (editorial change to another spec)