CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2019-11-21 REC

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/REC-css-contain-1-20191121/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/

None

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Accepted or Rejected and positive response
Rejected and no response
Rejected and negative response
Deferred
Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  contain:size needs to mention its effect on aspect-ratio
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5585
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5585#issuecomment-713158240

Issue 2. #
Summary:  Improve terminology
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5590
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5590#issuecomment-713164655

Issue 3. #
Summary:  Clarify on specifying aspect-ratio and contain:size on replaced elements
From:     Ting-Yu Lin
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5550
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5550#issuecomment-713166309

Issue 4. #
Summary:  Shortcut values should compute to the longhand ones
From:     Oriol Brufau
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5511
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5511#issuecomment-713161854

Issue 5. #
Summary:  Mistaken syntax in example
From:     TimVevida
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5506
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5506#issuecomment-713163539

Issue 6. #
Summary:  Use standard terminology rather than ad-hoc phrasing with the same meaning
From:     Mats Plamgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4946
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4946#issuecomment-617892686

Issue 7. #
Summary:  Clarify interaction between size containment and grid track sizing`
From:     Mats Plamgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4931
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/5643
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/5643#issuecomment-722045252

Issue 8. #
Summary:  Clarify effects of size containment on intrinsic sizes
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4741
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4741#issuecomment-585316698