Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/CR-css-contain-1-20190430/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted
, OutOfScope
,
Invalid
, Rejected
, or Retracted
.
Verified
indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Improve cross-spec definition linking From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3889 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3889#issuecomment-490202368 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3898 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 2. # Summary: contain:size for grid containers is underspecified From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892#issuecomment-490203339 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892#issuecomment-490227116 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892#issuecomment-490255708 Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 3. # Summary: Be more rigorous in using terminology (box vs element) From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4189 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4190 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4190#pullrequestreview-273847840