CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2019-04-30 CR

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/CR-css-contain-1-20190430/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Improve cross-spec definition linking
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3889
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3889#issuecomment-490202368
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3898
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 2. #
Summary:  contain:size for grid containers is underspecified
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892#issuecomment-490203339
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892#issuecomment-490227116
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892#issuecomment-490255708
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Be more rigorous in using terminology (box vs element)
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4189
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4190
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4190#pullrequestreview-273847840