Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-contain-1-20180524/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Size contain shouldn't apply to tables From: Morgan Rae Reschenberg Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-395242022 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-395256815 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-397009331
Issue 2. # Summary: specified column/row sizes on grid containers should contribute to contain:size From: Morgan Rae Reschenberg Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-399291965 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-399585146 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-400243568 Closed: Accepted / Editorial Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-402574020
Issue 3. # Summary: `contain` may not want to be animatable From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737#issuecomment-402574750 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737#issuecomment-402574750
Issue 4. # Summary: "scoped to an element" definition unused or unclear From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2845 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2845#issuecomment-401319909 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 5. # Summary: Need clarification on layout containment & fragmentation From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2840 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2840#issuecomment-401249631 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 6. # Summary: 'counter-increment' and 'content' property names should be linkified From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2800 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 7. # Summary: contain:layout is a CB for fixpos/abspos descendants but doesn't establish a stacking context From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-406716817 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-406735520 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-407956323 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-408244344 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-409762755
Issue 8. # Summary: containment vs baseline alignment From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-411126837 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-411371226 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-415094473
Issue 9. # Summary: Clarify spec text about ink-overflow From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3032 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3023#issuecomment-413883793 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3023#issuecomment-417016569
Issue 10. # Summary: maybe 'contain-size' shouldn't apply to display:table-caption From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-408369314 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-417018325 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-417018325
Issue 11. # Summary: containment probably shouldn't apply to most SVG elements From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410374314 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410385899 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410388088 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410809409 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-420710732 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-420710732