The FCC just voted to kill net neutrality. Congress can still stop it.

CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2018-05-24 CR

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-contain-1-20180524/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Size contain shouldn't apply to tables
From:     Morgan Rae Reschenberg
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-395242022
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-395256815
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-397009331
Issue 2. #
Summary:  specified column/row sizes on grid containers should contribute to contain:size
From:     Morgan Rae Reschenberg
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-399291965
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-399585146
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-400243568
Closed:   Accepted / Editorial
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-402574020
Issue 3. #
Summary:  `contain` may not want to be animatable
From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737#issuecomment-402574750
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737#issuecomment-402574750
Issue 4. #
Summary:  "scoped to an element" definition unused or unclear
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2845
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2845#issuecomment-401319909
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Need clarification on layout containment & fragmentation
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2840
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2840#issuecomment-401249631
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 6. #
Summary:  'counter-increment' and 'content' property names should be linkified
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2800
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 7. #
Summary:  contain:layout is a CB for fixpos/abspos descendants but doesn't establish a stacking context
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-406716817
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-406735520
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-407956323
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-408244344
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-409762755
Issue 8. #
Summary:  containment vs baseline alignement
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-411126837
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-411371226
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-415094473
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Clarify spec text about ink-overflow
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3032
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3023#issuecomment-413883793
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3023#issuecomment-417016569
Issue 10. #
Summary:  maybe 'contain-size' shouldn't apply to display:table-caption
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-408369314
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-417018325
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-417018325