Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-contain-1-20170221/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: layout containment should make an element containing block for absolute/fixed positioned elements From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issue-170956476 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issuecomment-295148939 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issuecomment-295148939
Issue 2. # Summary: Unclear what contain:size does for replaced elements From: Tab Atkins Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issue-169478944 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issuecomment-295148501 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issuecomment-295148501<Paste>
Issue 3. # Summary: We may want size containment in 1d From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issue-207386839 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issuecomment-295152488 Closed: Deferred Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issuecomment-295152488
Issue 4. # Summary: Make It easier to use contain: size in cases where the size is unknown From: bmaurer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issue-208209686 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-281277097 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-295157661 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-300306823
Issue 5. # Summary: Use proper HTML in markup example From: Thierry Koblentz Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issue-209813058 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issuecomment-282089800 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issuecomment-282330942 Resolved: Editorial
Issue 6. # Summary: Clarify ambiguous phrasing From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/830#issue-197360152 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 7. # Summary: Reuse "ink overflow" terminology From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/396#issue-170423394 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 8. # Summary: Layout containment and overflow From: Tab Atkins Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0314.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3vDKAKWCeUgPGC_T2BCSBCq1byCOJfzVfX8i+BbYqOC1Q@mail.gmail.com
Issue 9. # Summary: Splitting the "sizing" part from "layout" containment From: Tab Atkins Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDBe5Qq7Xb3Cxi6ee4y4b6FxbwYM_mxinvhjpkdWKFAiqw@mail.gmail.com Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCa-LHxVFGACoGav19wWztQg_GRDmS8fEf=EJaF_B0now@mail.gmail.com Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/AEA060EC-7235-4C90-97BE-CBC317229714@rivoal.net Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0384.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 10. # Summary: Remove dependency of paint containment on overflow clip From: leviw Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sME1oBdWnJ-kQikH0jGLC6xYamWr3qvsa6FurQLLeb_A@mail.gmail.com Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sME1oBdWnJ-kQikH0jGLC6xYamWr3qvsa6FurQLLeb_A@mail.gmail.com
Issue 11. # Summary: Overflow when layout containment is on should be ink overflow From: Florian Rvoal Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/86302BF1-1488-4E69-8529-3332B5A0BB9A@rivoal.net Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3t4RuTWnQr_dDtd18zQEBYRzfi0P35R_HACZGyPmbwVTA@mail.gmail.com Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/02e25a3f48bd0cd1be349513a024d71891d64de0 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 12. # Summary: The 'contain' property doesn't work well with regions From: Florian Rivoal Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/EF27E698-1B0A-47DB-ACF1-DACE59126A03@rivoal.net Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/D1B9B001.29FD3%25stearns@adobe.com Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/2A0F0B36-6765-475D-85D9-0AE7DDE6EB94@rivoal.net Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDA+4yz2952hHaf576B6rZdanJsYOQVn5Cg6zgZtd9REdw@mail.gmail.com Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 13. # Summary: Clarify interaction with display content From: Kyle Zentner Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CA+h3cCpKxWD=nXedcoFUffg=7+Lk0U=PjH4uVpxdNOePYiwjRg@mail.gmail.com Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/31FDCD6A-7CAE-4984-9FE4-C3D580CAB49B@rivoal.net Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-04-19/#e798577
Issue 14. # Summary: Clarify interaction with table parts From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/55BA836C.6060404@mozilla.com Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/B10ABC55-830F-46E7-88E5-5659F4E5E926@rivoal.net Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCxm8F+rQaUzQa47F-H=6W_peyTsZctOYV9a4ZHRUj4hA@mail.gmail.com Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDBQ7XCcO69pMn7V6F8DasjMfMWEuof2UTTXOJo9Uf0aZA@mail.gmail.com Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/A904B03A-4B63-480F-842E-F4290CD1AACE@rivoal.net Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-04-21/#e800809
Issue 15. # Summary: Typo From: Chris Rebert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1255 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 16. # Summary: Be more specific about security risks From: Ralf Swick Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1376 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial