CSS Cascading and Inheritance Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-07-30 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-cascade-3-20130730/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-cascade-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

• Accepted or Rejected and positive response
• Rejected and no response
• Rejected and negative response
• Deferred
• Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Reintroduce 'default' keyword for rolling back cascade
From:     Mike Sherov
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0120.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0127.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0130.html

Issue 2. #
Summary:  Media-dependent @import doesn't disqualify loading
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0634.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0196.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0621.html

Issue 3. #
Summary:  No comments! Everything looks good!
From:     SVGWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0496.html
Closed:   Accepted