CSS Fragmentation Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2015-01-29 LCWD

Dated Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css3-break-20150129/

Editor's Draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-break/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Clarify slicing requirements for monolithic elements
From:     Håkon Wium Lie
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/21703.26184.790775.276339@opera.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0233.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: 
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Slicing/pushing of replaced content should be controllable
From:     Håkon Wium Lie, Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0535.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0233.html
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html
Verified: 
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Replace ASCII diagrams with SVG
From:     Doug Schepers
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/54FC11AE.9040209@w3.org
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0251.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Address line-breaking controls
From:     Brad Kemper
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0172.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0173.html
Closed:   Accepted
Note:     Handled in CSS Text Level 4
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0186.html
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0205.html
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Grammatical errors
From:     Brady Duga  
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0380.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0214.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Confusion on break types wrt nested flows
From:     Brady Duga
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0382.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0218.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Name of 'any' is confusing
From:     Brady Duga
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0383.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0305.html
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0037.html
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Multiple principal boxes problematic
From:     Brady Duga
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0391.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0215.html
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editor's discretion
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Page progression undefined
From:     Brady Duga
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0392.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0216.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Multiple avoidances
From:     Brady Duga
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0394.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0217.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0228.html
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Breaking rules too specifically defined
From:     Brady Duga
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0395.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0229.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Generated content at breaks
From:     Sanders Kleinfeld
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0102.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0231.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0232.html
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
Verified: 
Issue 13. #
Summary:  box-decoration-break and margins
From:     Håkon Wium Lie
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0051.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0072.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0230.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html
Verified: 
Issue 14. #
Summary:  Drop cloned margins/padding/border if running out of space
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html
Verified: Reporter is spec editor
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Should widows/orphans really have priority over break-* controls?
From:     fantasai
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0009.html
Verified: Reporter is spec editor
Issue 16. #
Summary:  Clarify effect of 'box-decoration-break' on Shapes and Masking
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0099.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0223.html
Response: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/7d694dd2d77a/css-break/Overview.bs
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 17. #
Summary:  Parallel flows independence is too strong
From:     Peter Moulder
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0158.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0353.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0013.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Discuss
Issue 18. #
Summary:  Editorial nits
From:     Peter Moulder
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0170.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0148.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 19. #
Summary:  CSS Fragmentation should absorb CSSOM details for fragmented boxes
From:     Alan Stearns
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0140.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0154.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html
Issue 20. #
Summary:  Shorthand expansion into longhands breaks getPropertyCSSValue
From:     Peter Moulder
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0157.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0149.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor's discretion
Issue 21. #
Summary:  Breaks within inline-blocks
From:     François Remy
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0227.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0133.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0134.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html
Issue 22. #
Summary:  Clarify that fragments have border-boxes
From:     Robert O'Callahan
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Dec/0465.html
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0071.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 23. #
Summary:  Guaranteeing progress
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0146.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0153.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html
Issue 24. #
Summary:  Prefix 'page' and 'column' and 'region' break keywords with 'force-*'
From:     Theresa O'Connor
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0037.html
Closed:   Retracted
Resolved: TPAC 2015