The FCC just voted to kill net neutrality. Congress can still stop it.

Disposition of comments

Title
CSS Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3
Date
2012-02-14
URL
http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-background-20120214/

There are no objections.

# Author Summary and discussion Result
1. Florian Rivoal

Add 'background-position-x' and 'background-position-y'

  1. comment
  2. reply
Rejected and verified
2. David Baron

Computed value line for 'background-repeat' is imprecise

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
3 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Reorder the border-*-radius definitions in the spec

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
4 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

“Applies to” for 'border-radius' doesn't match prose

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
5 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Negative values for 'border-radius' should explicitly be illegal

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
6 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Rephrase note about inner curve in 5.2

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
7 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Unclear text about corner transitions in 5.4

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
8 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Insert “two corresponding” in the formula in 5.5

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
9 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Remove redundant paragraph “The rendering must be exactly…” in 5.5

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
10 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Example 24 should have only images A and B, D and C are the same

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
11 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Example 25 belongs in 5.1 instead of 5.6

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
12 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Use “{1,2}” instead of “?” in syntax of 'border-radius'

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
13 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Initial value of 'border-radius' should be “see individual properties”

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
14 Christoph Päper

Also allow to specify corners with an <angle> instead of two <length>

  1. comment
  2. reply
Rejected and verified
15 Christoph Päper

Add a “cut” corner style (border-corner-shape: normal|curved|sharp)

  1. comment
  2. reply
Rejected and verified
16 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

'Border-image' syntax allows odd trailing slash. Syntax should disallow it. And maybe also disallow two slashes in a row.

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
17 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

'background' shorthand specification text fails to say that 'background-image' is reset.

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
18 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

The specification should say which background and border properties apply to first-line and first-letter.

  1. comment
  2. reply
  3. comment
  4. reply
Accepted
19 Fantasai (WG member)

What is the background of the page area?

  1. comment
  2. (Filed as issue for css3-page)
Out of scope and verified
20 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Rewording and more verbose grammar (or an informative note) for 'background-position'

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
21 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Unclear what border style is used on table cells, when 'border-image-source' doesn't apply

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
22 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Clarify how border-image applies to table elements with collapsing borders (relation to border conflict resolution)

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
23 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Ambiguous phrasing about 'inset' and tables

  1. comment
Accepted
24 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Line thickness in 4.3 uses ambiguous words “may not” (“may not be negative”). Should say: “are not allowed.”

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted
25 Lev Solntsev

Allow colors (esp. semi-transparent ones) on all background layers.

  1. comment
  2. reply
  3. comment
  4. reply
  5. reply
Rejected but unverified
26 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

What is the “boundary” of a table cell?

  1. comment
  2. reply
Accepted

Legend:

StatusMeaning
Retracted Commenter has withdrawn the comment.
Accepted The WG accepted and applied the comment.
Out of scope and verified Commenter accepts that the comment is out of scope.
Invalid and verified Commenter accepts that the comment is invalid.
Rejected and verified Commenter accepts that the WG did not apply the comment.
Out of scope but unverified Comment out of scope, but commenter did not yet react.
Invalid but unverified Comment invalid, but commenter did not yet react.
Rejected but unverified Comment rejected, but commenter did not yet react.
Out of scope with objection Comment out of scope, but commenter disagrees.
Invalid with objection Comment invalid, but commenter disagrees.
Rejected with objection Comment rejected, but commenter objects.

This file was generated from issues-lc-2012.txt on 5 April 2012.