CSS Backgrounds and Borders Level 3 Disposition of Comments

Last call document:http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-background-20091015/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

• Accepted or Rejected + verified
• Rejected and not verified
• Formal Objection (There were no formal objections.)

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1.
Summary:  Define boundaries of mouse-event-trapping region to follow border
          radius curve and ignore border-image outset.
From:     Dave Hyatt
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0433.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Nov/0263.html
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 2.
Summary:  Add background-opacity
From:     Patrick H. Lauke
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0068.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Nov/0266.html
Closed:   Rejected

Issue 3.
Summary:  Allow more slashes in border-image shorthand
From:     Zack Weinberg
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0185.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Nov/0267.html
Closed:   Rejected
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Nov/0273.html

Issue 4.
Summary:  Rename box-break keywords
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0309.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Nov/0268.html
Closed:   Accepted